2017
DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2017.1363219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

k-Involutions of SL(n,k) over fields of characteristic 2

Abstract: Symmetric k-varieties generalize Riemannian symmetric spaces to reductive groups defined over arbitrary fields. For most perfect fields, it is known that symmetric k-varieties are in one-to-one correspondence with isomorphy classes of k-involutions. Therefore, it is useful to have representatives of each isomorphy class in order to describe the k-varieties. Here we give matrix representatives for each isomorphy class of k-involutions of SL(n, k) in the case that k is any field of characteristic 2; we also desc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular we want to extend Helminck's study of k-involutions and symmetric k-varieties [15] to include fields of characteristic 2. This has been studied for groups of type G 2 and A n in [22,25] and over fields of characteristic not 2 in [6,3,2,4,19,20,21]. We also extend the results of Aschbacher and Seitz [1] who studied similar structures for finite fields of characteristic 2.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In particular we want to extend Helminck's study of k-involutions and symmetric k-varieties [15] to include fields of characteristic 2. This has been studied for groups of type G 2 and A n in [22,25] and over fields of characteristic not 2 in [6,3,2,4,19,20,21]. We also extend the results of Aschbacher and Seitz [1] who studied similar structures for finite fields of characteristic 2.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The primary motivation is to extend Helminck's [14] study of k-involutions and symmetric k-varieties to include fields of characterstic 2. This has been studied for groups of type G 2 and A n in [19,22] and over fields of characteristic not 2 in [6,3,2,4,16,17,18]. We also extend the results of Aschbacher and Seitz [1] who studied similar structures for finite fields of characteristic 2.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%