“…Digital ethnography takes advantage of the theoretical versatility granted by the concept of affordances (boyd, 2011; Bucher & Helmond, 2017; Hutchby, 2001; Khazraee & Novak, 2018; McVeigh-Schultz & Baym, 2015) by unveiling the sociotechnical contextual relational properties of the digital metapolitical struggle spearheaded by AM. In so doing, it provides nuance to analyses of similar metapolitical pursuits in the global North (Feshami, 2021; Maly, 2019; Paul, 2021), as well as expanding the critical analyses of the far right in Sweden (Askanius, 2021; Lundström & Lundström, 2021; Merrill & Åkerlund, 2018), by centering on the importance of gender and the normative role of masculinity within such ecosystems (Blee, 2020; Ralph-Morrow, 2022; Vandiver, 2020). The concept of masculinity of crises is combined with a superordinate intersectionality perspective (Leek & Kimmel, 2015; Norocel et al, 2020) to suggest a way past the sensationalist and asystemic vagueness of “toxic masculinity” conceptualization (Waling, 2019).…”