2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

INTERSTELLAR BOUNDARY EXPLORERMEASUREMENTS AND MAGNETIC FIELD IN THE VICINITY OF THE HELIOPAUSE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its departure from circularity in the azimuthal range 210 • -330 • is due to the draping of the ISMF around the heliopause in the ENA source region beyond the heliopause (Schwadron et al 2009;Pogorelov et al 2011). We note that this elongation is perpendicular to the nose direction at 0 • azimuth in the rotated frame of Figure 11 and in the same direction as the elongation of the ribbon observed in both the elliptical fit (Figure 3) and the results of the statistical analysis ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Testing Of Modelssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Its departure from circularity in the azimuthal range 210 • -330 • is due to the draping of the ISMF around the heliopause in the ENA source region beyond the heliopause (Schwadron et al 2009;Pogorelov et al 2011). We note that this elongation is perpendicular to the nose direction at 0 • azimuth in the rotated frame of Figure 11 and in the same direction as the elongation of the ribbon observed in both the elliptical fit (Figure 3) and the results of the statistical analysis ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Testing Of Modelssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Results of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations of the ISM-heliospheric interaction (e.g., Pogorelov et al 2011) are consistent with (1) the ribbon center as the likely direction of the ISMF and (2) the arc traced by the ribbon as the result of perturbation of the ISMF geometry by the heliosphere. The perturbed ISMF magnetic field direction B P resulting in the ribbon is uniquely perpendicular to the radial line-of-sight vectorr from the inner heliosphere, i.e., B P ·r ≈ 0 (e.g., Schwadron et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the draping of the LISM magnetic field is a function of distance from the heliopause (e.g., Grygorczuk et al 2011;Pogorelov et al 2011;Zirnstein et al 2015a), the energy of the parent SW and ENA distribution may affect the distances at which the majority of ribbon ENAs (observed at 1 au) originate. We are not attempting to reproduce the IBEX results, but rather attempt to understand the effects of SW speed and ENA energy on the geometry of the secondary ENA ribbon, in the absence of time-dependent and asymmetric SW effects.…”
Section: Comparing Simulated and Ibex Ribbon Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The background heliosphere is based on an MHD description for the ionized plasma, kinetically coupled through chargeexchange collisions to the ambient neutral hydrogen that is calculated via a Monte Carlo approach (see Pogorelov et al 2011). This approach allows for arbitrary phase-space distributions of H. The protons also have a complex distribution function, since charge-exchange gives rise to PUIs with a velocity distribution different from the "core" plasma (Vasyliunas & Siscoe 1976).…”
Section: Improved Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%