2002
DOI: 10.7748/nr2002.07.9.4.7.c6194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insider-outsider perspectives of participant observation

Abstract: Ann Bonner and Gerda Tolhurst provide personal accounts of their experiences in conducting research involving participant observation. Issues discussed include the advantages and disadvantages of nurse researchers as insiders and outsiders. Also considered are strategies used to overcome both researcher effect and participant response to the researcher.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
185
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
185
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There are key advantages of using an interviewer who is involved in the research, the delivery of the unit and who is also familiar to the participants. According to Bonner and Tolhurst (2002) these individuals typically possess a wealth of knowledge and expertise in the field, a superior understanding of the research context, and an ability to naturally interact with students, which promotes a more insightful understanding of the students' opinions. Previously established trustful relations between participants and the interviewer also allows the possibility for interviewees to feel comfortable and free to talk openly, potentially increasing validity due to the added richness, honesty, fidelity and authenticity of the information acquired (Hammersley and Atkinson 1983;Tierney 1994).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are key advantages of using an interviewer who is involved in the research, the delivery of the unit and who is also familiar to the participants. According to Bonner and Tolhurst (2002) these individuals typically possess a wealth of knowledge and expertise in the field, a superior understanding of the research context, and an ability to naturally interact with students, which promotes a more insightful understanding of the students' opinions. Previously established trustful relations between participants and the interviewer also allows the possibility for interviewees to feel comfortable and free to talk openly, potentially increasing validity due to the added richness, honesty, fidelity and authenticity of the information acquired (Hammersley and Atkinson 1983;Tierney 1994).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was important in order to be able to describe phenomena as they are, rather than as I perceive them (Hammersley and Atkinson, 2007). Bonner and Tohurst (2002) argue that it is important for the researcher to be reflexive and critical in examining his/her assumptions throughout the data collection and analysis phase.…”
Section: Reflexivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, like Garbett and Ovens (2012), the initiation of conversations (both internal and external) aimed to raise the accessibility of the learning experiences in the context of rowing for the purposes of reflection and interpretation. In doing so we identified key advantages but principal among them, as noted by Bonner and Tolhurst (2002), was a superior understanding of the culture being researched. In this case, the detailed understanding was made possible through the intimacy Joe has with the culture across three tiers of engagement and across his working life.…”
Section: Tricky Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%