1974
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.1974.tb00656.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequality, Sociologically and Social Philosophically Seen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He suggests that rather than an individualistic, social elevator understanding of education measured through "materialistically defined success," many Americans prize education as developing cooperative intelligence, scientific inclination, and concern for eradicating class struggle. 4 Appropriately, Curran calls into question the link between the purposes of education and what should be equalized. Contra the inequality reports, Curran does not ask how school differences vary by individual, but rather how all school differences relate to nonschool forces and social ideas of education.…”
Section: Confronting National Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He suggests that rather than an individualistic, social elevator understanding of education measured through "materialistically defined success," many Americans prize education as developing cooperative intelligence, scientific inclination, and concern for eradicating class struggle. 4 Appropriately, Curran calls into question the link between the purposes of education and what should be equalized. Contra the inequality reports, Curran does not ask how school differences vary by individual, but rather how all school differences relate to nonschool forces and social ideas of education.…”
Section: Confronting National Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%