2021
DOI: 10.1017/s0142716421000308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirectstructural crosslinguistic influence in early Catalan–Spanish bilinguals in adulthood: Predicate selection in Catalan existential constructions

Abstract: This study reports an oral production experiment investigating the expression of existentiality in the Catalan of adult Catalan–Spanish early bilinguals (N = 58) with comparable proficiencies but different language dominance. The results show qualitative differences among the bilinguals in existential predicate selection and in their supply of partitive pronouns, modulated by language dominance. Balanced Bilinguals as well as Spanish-dominant bilinguals significantly produced more estar (in detriment of ser-hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even more importantly, not having a monolingual comparison group does not entail a lack of comparative data across a continuum of bilingualism. In fact, replacing a categorical view of bilingualism as a “yes/no” variable with a nuanced approach that views it as a mosaic of different factors (e.g., degree of use, contexts of use, proficiency, and context of acquisition) is likely to reveal patterns of variation that may be meaningful in terms of understanding how being bilingual affects language knowledge, language development, and cognition (Leivada et al, 2021; Perpiñán & Soto-Corominas, 2021; Soto-Corominas, 2021). In other words, if it is true that there is not one bilingualism, but many (Hodge et al, 2018; Ooi et al, 2018), we need to zoom in on different bilingual experiences in order to understand their similarities and differences and appreciate the individual characteristics of different sociolinguistic ecologies of speakers (Rodríguez-Ordóñez et al, 2022).…”
Section: Setting the Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even more importantly, not having a monolingual comparison group does not entail a lack of comparative data across a continuum of bilingualism. In fact, replacing a categorical view of bilingualism as a “yes/no” variable with a nuanced approach that views it as a mosaic of different factors (e.g., degree of use, contexts of use, proficiency, and context of acquisition) is likely to reveal patterns of variation that may be meaningful in terms of understanding how being bilingual affects language knowledge, language development, and cognition (Leivada et al, 2021; Perpiñán & Soto-Corominas, 2021; Soto-Corominas, 2021). In other words, if it is true that there is not one bilingualism, but many (Hodge et al, 2018; Ooi et al, 2018), we need to zoom in on different bilingual experiences in order to understand their similarities and differences and appreciate the individual characteristics of different sociolinguistic ecologies of speakers (Rodríguez-Ordóñez et al, 2022).…”
Section: Setting the Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter option is possible if bilinguals are influenced by their non-DOM L1 (or by their optional L1 DOM system), suggesting that if CLI is amplified by coactivation, which has been posited as impacting balanced bilingual individuals showing bidirectional effects (Putnam and Sánchez 2013;Putnam et al 2018), this influence is only discernible under specific DOM conditions. 5 In short, from our findings, it can be inferred that CLI is not a uniform phenomenon that applies across the board but rather manifests overtly in some instances, covertly in others, and indirectly in still others (Perpiñán and Soto-Corominas 2021).…”
Section: Rq1mentioning
confidence: 67%