2012
DOI: 10.1002/bdd.1796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo predictive release methods for medicated chewing gums

Abstract: Understanding the performance of a drug product in vivo plays a key role in the development of meaningful in vitro drug release methodology. In case of functional chewing gums, the mode and the mechanism of release and the site of application differ significantly from other conventional solid oral dosage forms and require a special consideration to extract meaningful information from clinical studies. In the current study, suitable drug release methodology was developed to predict the in vivo performance of an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sampling technique, stimulated and unstimulated saliva, was postulated as the reason of the bimodal fashion release concentration [7]. In this study, the second peak was observed at the end of the chewing period; chewing saliva stimulation is reduced after 5 min and this may have influenced the presence of the bimodal release concentration; as reported in literature, the highest salivary concentration of drugs (fluoride, nicotine, etc) released from gums was detected between 5 and 10 min from the beginning of use [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The sampling technique, stimulated and unstimulated saliva, was postulated as the reason of the bimodal fashion release concentration [7]. In this study, the second peak was observed at the end of the chewing period; chewing saliva stimulation is reduced after 5 min and this may have influenced the presence of the bimodal release concentration; as reported in literature, the highest salivary concentration of drugs (fluoride, nicotine, etc) released from gums was detected between 5 and 10 min from the beginning of use [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…For the jaw distance, a higher release was revealed with decreasing distance for both devices in the following order; apparatus A: 0.7 < 0.5 < 0.3 mm; apparatus B: 1.8 < 1.6 < 1.4 mm (Fig. 2) (26). In the case of apparatus B, a high chewing frequency in combination with high twisting angles cannot be used, due to a limited rotation speed of the upper piston (27).…”
Section: Parameters Of In Vitro Testing Devices Affecting Drug Releasementioning
confidence: 87%
“…The parameters of in vitro testing devices -chewing frequency, twisting angle of the jaws, and jaw distance -can be modified while the temperature is usually kept at 37 °C ± 0.5 °C (14). A general recommendation for adjustments of the release test devices is given by Gajendran et al (26). In principle, faster drug release was observed when the frequency increased from 40 to 60 strokes per minute.…”
Section: Parameters Of In Vitro Testing Devices Affecting Drug Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistency of oral processing (chewing, swallowing) can be affected by the texture of the chewing gum (Blee et al ., ). Therefore, it is possible that the release properties of bioactive compounds may alter depending on these mechanical effects (Haahr et al ., ; Gajendran et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The consistency of oral processing (chewing, swallowing) can be affected by the texture of the chewing gum (Blee et al, 2011). Therefore, it is possible that the release properties of bioactive compounds may alter depending on these mechanical effects (Haahr et al, 2004;Gajendran et al, 2012). Main textural quality parameters for chewing gums such as hardness, adhesiveness, springiness, cohesiveness, chewiness and resilience were determined (Table 3).…”
Section: Texture Of Chewing Gum Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%