2013
DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2012.757360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivoevaluation of occlusalcontact area and maximum bite force in patients with various types of implant-supported prostheses

Abstract: Use of implants for removable dentures and fixed reconstructions improve occlusal contact area and bite force.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
4
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
17
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they exhibited ceramic chipping on the occlusal surface at a relatively low load of between 200 and 400 N, which was similar to the maximum occlusal force of normal individuals or implant-supported overdenture wearers. [21][22][23][24] The chipping was followed by tooth detachment from the denture base and bulk fracture. Although the effect of the loading sphere should be considered for the evaluation, a ceramic denture tooth may be contraindicated for use with a thin denture base.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, they exhibited ceramic chipping on the occlusal surface at a relatively low load of between 200 and 400 N, which was similar to the maximum occlusal force of normal individuals or implant-supported overdenture wearers. [21][22][23][24] The chipping was followed by tooth detachment from the denture base and bulk fracture. Although the effect of the loading sphere should be considered for the evaluation, a ceramic denture tooth may be contraindicated for use with a thin denture base.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were evaluated on a comparative basis with the statistical methods described subsequently and also by comparisons with the reported maximal occlusal force of normal individuals or denture wearers. [21][22][23][24] After the load test, the fractured specimens were observed with optical light microscopy at ×25 magnification (AX70PROVIS; Olympus) to evaluate the fracture initiation site and fracture mode. Some specimens were coated with platinum, and the surface was observed by scanning electron microscopy (S-4500 SEM; Hitachi Ltd).…”
Section: Fracture Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three circular areas for load appliance, correspondent to the described semi -spheres, were defined 47 . According to ISO standard 14801, the load was applied forming 30 degrees with the implant long axis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 Because, contrary to the isotropy of resin, the bone shows orthotropic characteristics, properties would have to be defined taking into account the Cartesian coordinate system [48][49][50] (Table 3). The model design and other sets were maintained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To limit loading conditions, the mandibular ramus was constrained from the X, Y and Z directions. The loading force of occlusion was referred to previous study, which reported that the bite force of 2-implantsupported removal full-prostheses and 6-implant-supported fi xed fullprostheses was 416 and 516 N, respectively 9) . According to this report, 500 N was defined as the loading force uniformly in any conditions, and the von Mises stress (measured in MPa) on the residual bone was calculated by FEA.…”
Section: Dental Implants Simulation and Feamentioning
confidence: 99%