2011
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivodeployment of mechanically adaptive nanocomposites for intracortical microelectrodes

Abstract: We recently introduced a series of stimuli-responsive, mechanically-adaptive polymer nanocomposites. Here, we report the first application of these bio-inspired materials as substrates for intracortical microelectrodes. Our hypothesis is that the ideal electrode should be initially stiff to facilitate minimal trauma during insertion into the cortex, yet becomes mechanically compliant to match the stiffness of the brain tissue and minimize forces exerted on the tissue, attenuating inflammation. Microprobes crea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
157
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
157
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[12] Contributing factors believed to adversely affect the quality of the electrode-tissue interface in a chronic time window include electrode size, [13,14] density of electrode material, [15] skull tethering mechanisms and associated micromotion of the implant, [16] and mechanical compliance of the electrode itself. [17,18] Considering the aforementioned characteristics, the ideal implantable electrode will be small, soft, mechanically-strong, and have a density similar to neural tissue. Present implantable electrodes are made from rigid materials such as noble metals, stainless steel, or crystalline silicon, though the density and stiffness of these materials render them non-ideal for chronic interaction with neural tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Contributing factors believed to adversely affect the quality of the electrode-tissue interface in a chronic time window include electrode size, [13,14] density of electrode material, [15] skull tethering mechanisms and associated micromotion of the implant, [16] and mechanical compliance of the electrode itself. [17,18] Considering the aforementioned characteristics, the ideal implantable electrode will be small, soft, mechanically-strong, and have a density similar to neural tissue. Present implantable electrodes are made from rigid materials such as noble metals, stainless steel, or crystalline silicon, though the density and stiffness of these materials render them non-ideal for chronic interaction with neural tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, stimuli-responsive materials may quickly recover their initial stiffness after explantation. Therefore, we have developed a method by which the mechanical properties of implanted microsamples can be measured ex vivo, with simulated physiological conditions maintained using moisture and temperature control 13,16,17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, a custom microtensile tester was designed to accommodate microscale samples 13,17 with widely-varying Young's moduli (range of 10 MPa to 5 GPa). As our interests are in the application of PVAc-NC as a biologically-adaptable neural probe substrate, a tool capable of mechanical characterization of samples at the microscale was necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations