2016
DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.1687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo comparison of tantalum, tungsten, and bismuth enteric contrast agents to complement intravenous iodine for double‐contrast dual‐energy CT of the bowel

Abstract: To assess the ability of dual-energy CT (DECT) to separate intravenous contrast of bowel wall from intraluminal contrast, we scanned 16 rabbits on a clinical DECT scanner: n=3 using only iodinated intravenous contrast; and n=13 double-contrast enhanced scans using iodinated intravenous contrast and experimental enteric non-iodinated contrast agents in the bowel lumen (5 bismuth-, 4 tungsten-, and 4 tantalum-based). Representative image pairs from conventional CT images and DECT iodine density maps of small bow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we did not study human subjects, for whom results may vary compared to this relatively small animal model, as the X-ray attenuation of humans will be greater. Finally, we have only studied gold based agents in this report, while agents based on bismuth, tantalum, ytterbium and other elements have been reported as CT contrast agents and for other applications 10,4751 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we did not study human subjects, for whom results may vary compared to this relatively small animal model, as the X-ray attenuation of humans will be greater. Finally, we have only studied gold based agents in this report, while agents based on bismuth, tantalum, ytterbium and other elements have been reported as CT contrast agents and for other applications 10,4751 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we did not compare the CMEP to conventional MD techniques. However, generation of the tungsten, or indeed any high-Z decomposition images is precluded at RSCT as the commercial software is limited to materials that do not have a k-edge between 40 and 140 keV (15, 17). Furthermore both RSCT and DSCT software are unable to generate three separate material-specific images; both are limited to two materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three contrast-producing materials were included; tungsten, iodine and calcium, details of which are provided in Table 1. Tungsten was chosen for it’s distinct dual-energy ratio compared to calcium and iodine (19) and because it has been identified as a candidate element for contrast agent development (15, 17, 19, 27). Iodine and tungsten were formulated to concentrations of 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/mL of the active element, while calcium was formulated to 20, 30, 40 and 50% calcium nitrate by weight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This increases the attenuation in the high-kVp image, and when combined with the other photon interactions, results in a similar CT numbers at low- and high-kVp images[42]. The relative difference in low- to high-kVp CT number ratios allow for the contribution of two different materials to be determined at DECT material decomposition post-processing[19, 43]. …”
Section: Ct Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%