2003
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.038018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vivo and In Vitro Heterogeneity of Segment Length Changes in the Semimembranosus Muscle of the Toad

Abstract: Many studies examine sarcomere dynamics in single fibres or length–tension dynamics in whole muscles in vivo or in vitro, but few studies link the various levels of organisation. To relate data addressing in vitro muscle segment behaviour with in vivo whole muscle behaviour during locomotion, we measured in vivo strain patterns of muscle segments using three sonomicrometry crystals implanted along a fascicle of the semimembranosus muscle in the American toad (Bufo americanus; n= 6) during hopping. The centre c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
69
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is often assumed that there are no regional differences in fibre strain within a striated muscle, though recent work on vertebrates has shown this assumption to be false (e.g. Huijing 1985;Pappas et al 2002;Ahn et al 2003;Higham et al 2008). Our finding that fibres at different locations within the same muscular organ experience very different strain and strain rates also contradicts this long-standing assumption.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…It is often assumed that there are no regional differences in fibre strain within a striated muscle, though recent work on vertebrates has shown this assumption to be false (e.g. Huijing 1985;Pappas et al 2002;Ahn et al 2003;Higham et al 2008). Our finding that fibres at different locations within the same muscular organ experience very different strain and strain rates also contradicts this long-standing assumption.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Although the landing phase of a jump or a hop requires the absorption of energy, most frogs use their forelimbs and bodies rather than their hindlimbs for this function (Nauwelaerts & Aerts 2006). In fact, no EMG activity is observed in the hindlimb muscles of anurans during the landing phase of a jump or a hop (Olson & Marsh 1998;Ahn et al 2003). It is possible that the lack of eccentric loading allows frog hindlimb muscles to safely operate on the descending limb of the force-length curve with little threat of eccentric muscle damage.…”
Section: Discussion (A) Operating Lengths Of the Frog Plantarismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the muscle mechanics measurements made in this study are unlikely to have exactly replicated the activation patterns and length changes used by rocket frogs during jumping, the size of rocket frogs would exclude usage of the techniques necessary to determine realistic length change waveforms. Previous sonomicrometry measurements during jumping in semimembranosus muscle of Bufo americanus (Ahn et al 2003) and plantaris longus muscle of jumping Rana catesbeiana combined with modeling of the frog plantaris longus muscle-tendon unit (Roberts and Marsh 2003) have demonstrated uncoupling of skeletal muscle length changes from whole-body movements during jumping. Rapid early shortening of plantaris longus muscle without movement of the frog causes stretching of tendons and consequent elastic energy storage, which subsequently enhances muscle power output during takeoff.…”
Section: Relationship Between Muscle Mechanics and Jump Performancementioning
confidence: 99%