2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05553.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo and in vitro approaches in understanding the differences between Caucasian and African skin types: specific involvement of the papillary dermis

Abstract: Background Most of the identified differences between Caucasian and African skin types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,23 However, currently there is no consensus regarding dermal ECM composition in these different groups. Furthermore, the dermal ECM of both Eurasian and Far East Asian skin is relatively deficient in fibrillar collagens I and III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16,23 However, currently there is no consensus regarding dermal ECM composition in these different groups. Furthermore, the dermal ECM of both Eurasian and Far East Asian skin is relatively deficient in fibrillar collagens I and III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous comparative studies have focused on the differences between Eurasian and African skin types only, and our data on epidermal morphometrics and collagen VII distribution at the DEJ are consistent with their findings. 16,23 However, currently there is no consensus regarding dermal ECM composition in these different groups. Previous studies have employed disparate methods to characterize the histology of Eurasian and African skin using biopsies of photoprotected and photoexposed skin from young and old participants, resulting in poorly controlled datasets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have identified differences in epidermal thickness and morphology, dermoepidermal junction (DEJ) interdigitation and dermal ECM composition. [15][16][17] While these comparisons help to define histology of healthy skin, they provide no functional information on its biomechanical behaviour. Previous attempts to characterize skin biomechanics in black African and white Northern European cohorts have been largely inconclusive due to contradictory findings between different studies.…”
Section: What Does This Study Add?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent comparative studies of young, photoprotected skin from black African and white Northern European cohorts have attempted to understand at the histological level what are considered to be the defining characteristics of ‘healthy skin’ in these diverse cohorts. These studies have identified differences in epidermal thickness and morphology, dermoepidermal junction (DEJ) interdigitation and dermal ECM composition …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative studies of young black and white individuals have attempted to understand at the histologic level what is considered to be the defining characteristics of healthy skin. Such studies have identified differences in epidermal thickness and morphology, DEJ interdigitation and dermal extracellular matrix (ECM) composition (Girardeau et al, 2009;Girardeau-Hubert et al, 2012;Langton et al, 2014). Skin biomechanical function has also been assessed in diverse cohorts and identified that skin architecture-both epidermal morphology and elastic fiber arrangement-are essential for providing skin's optimal biomechanical properties (Langton et al, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%