2013
DOI: 10.1111/jam.12350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitroremoval of ochratoxin A by two strains ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaeand their performances under fermentative and stressing conditions

Abstract: Aims: The aim of this research was to study the effect of time, temperature, sugar content and addition of diammonium phosphate (DAP) on ochratoxin A (OTA) removal by two strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a completely randomized design. Methods and Results: The strains were grown in a medium containing OTA (2 lg l À1 ), two sugar levels (200 and 250 g l À1 ), with or without DAP (300 mg l À1 ), and incubated at 25-30°C. The yeasts were able to decrease the toxin amount by c. 70%, with the highest remov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected and reported elsewhere (Angioni et al, 2007;Petruzzi et al, 2013Petruzzi et al, , 2014aPetruzzi et al, , 2014bPetruzzi et al, , 2014cPetruzzi et al, , 2014d, the removal process was significantly affected by kind of strain, temperature, sugar (for the strains W28 and W46) and DAP addition (for the strains W13, W28, W47 and Y28) (data not shown). Fig.…”
Section: Wine Fermentation Performances and Ota Removalsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected and reported elsewhere (Angioni et al, 2007;Petruzzi et al, 2013Petruzzi et al, , 2014aPetruzzi et al, , 2014bPetruzzi et al, , 2014cPetruzzi et al, , 2014d, the removal process was significantly affected by kind of strain, temperature, sugar (for the strains W28 and W46) and DAP addition (for the strains W13, W28, W47 and Y28) (data not shown). Fig.…”
Section: Wine Fermentation Performances and Ota Removalsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Five wild S. cerevisiae strains (W13, W28, W46, W47 and Y28) were used throughout this research; these yeasts were previously studied for their ability to remove OTA under in vitro conditions, as well as for their phenotypical and technological traits (Petruzzi, Sinigaglia, Corbo, Beneduce, & Bevilacqua, 2013;Petruzzi et al, 2014aPetruzzi et al, , 2014bPetruzzi, Corbo, Sinigaglia, & Bevilacqua, 2014c). To determine intra-species variability, yeasts were characterized by interdelta analysis, using PCR primers described by Legras and Karst (2003), i.e.…”
Section: Yeast Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were used as input for a two-way ANOVA; thus, a significant interactive effect between biotype and tempera ture was observed for biotypes II and V. For these biotypes, OTA removal increased when temperatures increased (data not shown), in agreement with previous research that focused on the effects of fermentative conditions (temper ature, sugar, and nitrogen supplementation) on the bio remediation of the toxin (36). A temperature-dependent mechanism was also observed by Patharajan et al (34) for OTA removal mediated by Metschnikowia pulcherrima MACH1, Pichia guilliermonodii M8, and Rhodococcus erythropolis AR14.…”
Section: Resistance O F the Biotypes O F S C E Re V Isia E To Singlesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…A temperature-dependent mechanism was also observed by Patharajan et al (34) for OTA removal mediated by Metschnikowia pulcherrima MACH1, Pichia guilliermonodii M8, and Rhodococcus erythropolis AR14. On the other hand, sugar did not affect the removal ability of the biotypes (data not shown), whereas its effect was found to be positive for two wild strains of S. cerevisiae (36), thus suggesting a kind of strainspecific variability.…”
Section: Resistance O F the Biotypes O F S C E Re V Isia E To Singlecontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Even though these methods can completely degrade ochratoxin A, they have low efficiency and high cost and can damage nutrients. Biological removal is the most promising method because it can destroy mycotoxins without harmful chemicals or losses in nutrient value of the decontaminated food and feed (Petruzzi et al 2014). This method uses micro-organisms or enzymes to decompose, transform or absorb ochratoxin A (Abrunhosa et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%