For a given positive energy balance, a low capacity to oxidize fat could contribute to weight gain (low fat oxidation hypothesis). This hypothesis is based on the arguments that for a given stable diet and food quotient (FQ), the respiratory quotient (RQ) is higher in obesity prone (OP) than in obesity resistant individuals (OR) and that a high RQ predicts higher future weight gain. A review of 42 studies shows that there is no convincing experimental support to these arguments and thus for the low fat oxidation hypothesis. A power analysis also shows that this hypothesis might be impossible to experimentally confirm because very large numbers of subjects would be needed to reject the null hypotheses that the 24-h RQ is not different in OP and OR or that future weight gain is not different in individuals with a low and high 24-h RQ at baseline. A re-examination of the significance of the 24-hour and fasting RQ also shows that the assumption underlying the low fat oxidation hypothesis that a high RQ reflects a low capacity to oxidize fat is not valid: For a stable diet, the 24-h RQ entirely depends on FQ and energy balance, and the fasting RQ mainly depends on the FQ and energy balance and on the size of glycogen stores. KEYWORDS food quotient, fuel partitioning, obesity, respiratory quotient 1 | INTRODUCTION It has been hypothesized that fat accumulation and weight gain could be favoured by two defects in fat oxidation: (a) a low intrinsic capacity to oxidize fat, 1-3 which characterizes "low fat oxidizers" 3,4 ("low fat oxidation hypothesis" of weight gain), or (b) a low ability to quickly adjust fat oxidation to an increase in fat intake, 5-8 which is one of the characteristics of individuals with "metabolic inflexibility" 9 ("metabolic inflexibility hypothesis" of weight gain). According to the low fat oxidation hypothesis of weight gain, for a given positive energy balance, fat oxidation is lower and fat accumulation is higher in individuals with a low than a high intrinsic capacity to oxidize fat, and over time, this could result in larger weight gains. 3 According to the "metabolic inflexibility hypothesis" of weight gain, for a given energy intake (EI), the slow adjustment of fat oxidation to an increase in fat intake in individuals with metabolic inflexibility favours fat storage with a compensatory increase in glucose oxidation from carbohydrate (CHO) stores. The result is a reduction in glycogen stores that could be a signal for increasing food intake and EI through the glycogenostatic model of the control of appetite. [5][6][7][8] Because of constant day-to-day variations in the percentage of fat in the diet, individuals with metabolic inflexibility could repeatedly accumulate small amounts of fat, which over time could lead to weight gain.List of abbreviations: ACC2, acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2; AICAR, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide; AMPK, AMP-activated kinase; BMI, body mass index; CHO, carbohydrate; d, difference in 24-h RQ estimated between OP and OR; d/SD, standardized difference; EE, ...