In Vitro Evaluation of Allergen Potencies of Commercial House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Reagents

Abstract

PurposeThe clinical efficacy of allergen-immunotherapy is known to be dose dependent. However, optimal maintenance dosage has not yet been determined for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Furthermore, since companies adopt their own units for expression of allergenicity, the allergen concentrations of individual reagents cannot be compared easily. We sought to measure and compare the allergenicities of 3 commercially available house dust mite (HDM) SLIT regents and a subcutaneous immunotherapy reagent.MethodsWe measured the HDM allergenic potency of the maintenance dosages of three SLIT reagents: Staloral® (300 index of reactivity [IR] /mL, recommended maintenance dosage [MD]: 120 IR), SLITone® (1,000 standard therapeutic unit [STU]/mL, recommended MD: 200 STU), Wolwopharma® (100 µg/mL, recommended MD: 20 µg), and subcutaneous immunotherapy regents of Hollister-Stier (10,000 allergy unit [AU] /mL). The allergenic potency was assessed by measuring the total protein concentrations, mite group 1 and 2 allergens using 2-site ELISA, and an inhibition test against IgE specific to Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus.ResultsThe protein content of the Wolwopharma® reagent was 1.5-261.4 times higher than that of the other 2 SLIT reagents. The concentration of group 1 major allergens in Staloral® (132.03 µg/mL) was 33- to 44.5-fold higher than in SLITone® (4.00 µg/mL) and Wolwopharma® (2.97 µg/mL). The concentration of group 2 major allergen was also 8.9- to 10.5-fold higher in Staloral® (15.7 µg/mL) than in SLITone® (1.8 µg/mL) or Wolwopharma® (1.5 µg/mL). An ELISA inhibition study against HDM-specific IgE showed that the allergen potency of Staloral® reagent is 8.5-fold and 21-fold higher than that of SLITone® or Wolwopharma®, respectively. The differences between the maintenance dosages are further exaggerated by the differences in the recommended volumes of SLIT reagents.ConclusionsThe allergen potencies of commercially available HDM SLIT reagents are markedly different. Consensus regarding the optimal allergen concentration for SLIT reagents used to treat HDM respiratory allergies is needed.

Minor allergen patterns in birch pollen allergen products—A question of pollen?

“…These observed differences, especially between products from different manufacturers, are not limited to minor allergens though. As already described in the literature, BP allergen products also differ greatly with regard to their main quality parameters total allergenic activity, total protein and Bet v 1 content . Regarding SCIT products, these parameters could only be determined in intermediates, prior to chemical modification and/or absorption.…”

Quality control of house dust mite extracts by broad-spectrum profiling of allergen-related enzymatic activities

“…Our method proved to be compatible with glycerol and phenol, the most common excipients in the formulation of skin prick test and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) products . In addition, the sensitivity of our method allows the analysis of highly diluted extracts (0.75 μg Der p 1/ml and 0.63 μg Der p 2/ml), equivalent to the lowest concentrated products cited in the literature . Further investigation is needed to confirm compatibility with other AIT products (e.g.…”

Guideline on allergen immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases

“…If SLIT is unsuccessful, the diagnosis ought to be critically reviewed. If no competing allergies can be detected, a change of the preparation can be considered, since the composition of different allergen extracts varies depending on the manufacturer [ 367 ].…”