2001
DOI: 10.1089/108497801753354339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In VitroEffect of Gelatins on Murine Cell Proliferation

Abstract: Porcine skin (PS) gelatin suppressed proliferation of a murine hepatic cell carcinoma cell line, MH134, a murine fibrosarcoma cell line, Meth A and a murine T cell lymphoma cell line, RL Male 1. The magnitude of suppression of the proliferation by cold water fish skin (CWFS) or bovine bone (BB) gelatin was lower than that by PS gelatin. On the other hand, BB gelatin stimulated proliferation of murine spleen cells. The magnitude of stimulation of the proliferation by CWFS gelatin was lower than that by BB gelat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high proliferation rate of miPS cells on the hydrogels and Gelatin‐PS scaffold indicates that an undifferentiated state of miPS cells can be well maintained on scaffolds since the undifferentiated stem cells exhibited high proliferation potential, which decreases as stem cells mature and differentiate (Smith et al ., ; Williams et al ., ). It is well known that a Gelatin‐PS scaffold provides excellent cell adhesion and proliferation for mES cells (Yang et al ., , ; Kojima et al ., ). Our results indicate that the two hydrogels had even better performance than the Gelatin‐PS scaffold, especially the PNaAMPS hydrogels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The high proliferation rate of miPS cells on the hydrogels and Gelatin‐PS scaffold indicates that an undifferentiated state of miPS cells can be well maintained on scaffolds since the undifferentiated stem cells exhibited high proliferation potential, which decreases as stem cells mature and differentiate (Smith et al ., ; Williams et al ., ). It is well known that a Gelatin‐PS scaffold provides excellent cell adhesion and proliferation for mES cells (Yang et al ., , ; Kojima et al ., ). Our results indicate that the two hydrogels had even better performance than the Gelatin‐PS scaffold, especially the PNaAMPS hydrogels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…3 MMC-treated spleen cells as well as MMC-treated RL? 1 cells partly suppressed the anti-proliferative activity of PS gelatin to RL?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Afterward, we observed that BB gelatin stimulates proliferation of murine spleen cells, especially T cells 2 and that porcine skin (PS) gelatin inhibits proliferation of several kinds of murine tumor cells followed by apoptosis of those tumor cells. 3 In this study, we used two kinds of gelatin (BB and PS gelatins) and two sorts of murine cells (spleen cells of Balb/c mice and the malignant counterpart, RL? 1 cells) in order to investigate two contrary actions of PS and BB gelatins on murine benign and malignant cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, we used equine bone marrow-derived (BM-)MSCs, because the horse is both a patient with a large clinical need for better articular cartilage repair and a recommended animal model for pre-clinical testing of cartilage regeneration strategies 50,51 . Further, equine MSCs do express the receptor that allows endotoxin signalling, namely TLR4 52,53 , and have previously been shown to be sensitive to LPS 21 . Our data suggest that the presence of endogenous LPS does, however, not affect chondrogenic differentiation of healthy equine BM-MSCs embedded within GelMA hydrogels.…”
Section: Effect Of Endotoxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GelMAs in the production of collagen type I. Gelatine types A and B are produced in different ways 59 , which results in different isoelectric points 60 and can influence degree of methacrylation and molecular weight 59 . Furthermore, the species and tissue type from which the gelatine is extracted could influence cell response 52,53 . Type A and B variants from bovine and porcine origin were included, but as the current study was not designed to identify the influence of gelatine type, further research is needed to elucidate which qualities of type A and type B GelMA could influence MSC differentiation and thereby impact tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications.…”
Section: Effect Of Gelatine Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%