“…Afterwards, the remaining 47 reports were subjected to full-text review for eligibility assessment. Moreover, 30 additional articles were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria: six were animal studies [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], one was a case report [ 30 ], three dealt with regenerative endodontics [ 31 , 32 , 33 ], 16 were based on a surgical topic [ 2 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ], one dealt with cervical resorption [ 49 ], and three were in vitro studies [ 50 , 51 , 52 ]. Thus, the final inclusion for this qualitative review comprised 17 articles.…”