2012
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography

Abstract: Artifacts around titanium implants in CBCT images were distributed according to a geometrical pattern.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
112
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(39 reference statements)
4
112
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…19,20 The severity of these artefacts produced by dental implants on image quality has been reported to be greater for CBCT than for multislice CT, 21 to be CBCT unit dependent, 22 to influence the reliability of linear measurements of adjacent marginal bone 23 and to vary depending on the implant surface, with increasing Gray values occurring on buccal and lingual aspects. 24 Field of view (FOV) is the term used to refer to the scan volume of a particular CBCT unit. FOV is determined by detector size and shape, beam projection geometry and beam collimation, which limits radiation exposure to a particular region of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 The severity of these artefacts produced by dental implants on image quality has been reported to be greater for CBCT than for multislice CT, 21 to be CBCT unit dependent, 22 to influence the reliability of linear measurements of adjacent marginal bone 23 and to vary depending on the implant surface, with increasing Gray values occurring on buccal and lingual aspects. 24 Field of view (FOV) is the term used to refer to the scan volume of a particular CBCT unit. FOV is determined by detector size and shape, beam projection geometry and beam collimation, which limits radiation exposure to a particular region of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Artefacts have been shown to be always present near titanium implants. 31,40 In these studies, the position of implant did not affect the artefacts. However, the grey value reduction decreased with increasing distance from the implant surface, which is in agreement with the results of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Most ACIF procedures will use some manner of metal implant, either stainless steel or titanium, in the procedure. Admittedly, CBCT does suffer from artefact immediately next to the anterior plate [14,15]. This does not, however, extend to the entire volume involved in the fusion procedure, and the artefact diminishes rapidly with distance from the implant [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Admittedly, CBCT does suffer from artefact immediately next to the anterior plate [14,15]. This does not, however, extend to the entire volume involved in the fusion procedure, and the artefact diminishes rapidly with distance from the implant [15]. Therefore, while a small percentage of the imaged volume will be affected by implant artefact, CBCT still provides good imaging quality through the overwhelming majority of the imaged volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%