2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01250.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi with Sensititre Yeast OneTM

Abstract: Sensititre is a colorimetric microdilution method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing based on the M27-A document (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) for yeasts. Difference between both methods is the presence of Alamar-blue and RPMI 1640 (glucose 2%) as culture medium. Antifungal susceptibility to amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole and flucytosine, 100 opportunistic filamentous fungi (Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp., Scedosporium spp.) obtained from pathologi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main disadvantage of the CLSI M38-A procedure is that the tray preparation is time consuming. In recent years, the usefulness of the Alamar blue and Sensititre YeastOne panels has been evaluated for molds testing, using reference macro-and microdilution methods [1,2,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12] . Therefore, methodologically easier systems, such as Sensititre YeastOne, are a useful method and an alternative to reference methods for determining the antifungal susceptibility of filamentous fungi in routine clinical laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main disadvantage of the CLSI M38-A procedure is that the tray preparation is time consuming. In recent years, the usefulness of the Alamar blue and Sensititre YeastOne panels has been evaluated for molds testing, using reference macro-and microdilution methods [1,2,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12] . Therefore, methodologically easier systems, such as Sensititre YeastOne, are a useful method and an alternative to reference methods for determining the antifungal susceptibility of filamentous fungi in routine clinical laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been growing interest in the development of a reference method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes [5] , mainly because of the great need for an easier and reproducible method for in vitro susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi which will serve as a guide for selecting and monitoring antifungal therapy. Alternatives to the CLSI method are currently under investigation, and 2 commercial methods, E-Test and Sensititre YeastOne , have been evaluated for both yeast and molds [1,2,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, infections due to dermatophytes are often associated with relapses after cessation of therapy 20 . By the way, in vitro antifungal susceptibility tests could help to optimize the therapy and to select an effective antifungal agent for this mycosis 3 . A standard method for susceptibility testing of dermatophytes is lacking, but good results of MIC using either broth macrodilution or broth microdilution tests have been obtained in several reports 9,10,12,18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sensititre Yeastone plate (TREK Diagnostic Systems, Cleveland, OH) is a microtiter broth dilution plate for antifungal sensitivity testing (17,18). The plate contains seven dried antifungal drugs at 2-fold dilutions (Table 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%