2017
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-16-0683
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro and In Vivo Synergistic Antitumor Activity of the Combination of BKM120 and Erlotinib in Head and Neck Cancer: Mechanism of Apoptosis and Resistance

Abstract: We previously reported that the EGFR-targeted inhibitor erlotinib induces G arrest of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) cell lines without inducing significant apoptosis. Large-scale genomic studies suggest that >50% of SCCHN cases have activation of PI3K pathways. This study investigated whether cotargeting of EGFR and PI3K has synergistic antitumor effects and apoptosis induction. We examined growth suppression, apoptosis, and signaling pathway modulation resulting from single and combined… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data are consistent with previous studies showing the benefit of PI3K-and EGFR-inhibitor combination therapies (Rebucci et al, 2011;Young et al, 2013;D'Amato et al, 2014;Lattanzio et al, 2015;Michmerhuizen et al, 2016;Anisuzzaman et al, 2017;Silva-Oliveira et al, 2017) and also extend that work by discovering that PI3K inhibitors are much more effective in combination with irreversible than reversible EGFR inhibitors in HNSCC. In prior work comparing the classes of EGFR-targeting monotherapies in this cancer type, preclinical data demonstrated that irreversible EGFR inhibitors are superior to other EGFR-targeting agents, including cetuximab (Ather et al, 2013;Silva-Oliveira et al, 2017) and reversible inhibitor gefitinib (Young et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our data are consistent with previous studies showing the benefit of PI3K-and EGFR-inhibitor combination therapies (Rebucci et al, 2011;Young et al, 2013;D'Amato et al, 2014;Lattanzio et al, 2015;Michmerhuizen et al, 2016;Anisuzzaman et al, 2017;Silva-Oliveira et al, 2017) and also extend that work by discovering that PI3K inhibitors are much more effective in combination with irreversible than reversible EGFR inhibitors in HNSCC. In prior work comparing the classes of EGFR-targeting monotherapies in this cancer type, preclinical data demonstrated that irreversible EGFR inhibitors are superior to other EGFR-targeting agents, including cetuximab (Ather et al, 2013;Silva-Oliveira et al, 2017) and reversible inhibitor gefitinib (Young et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Comparisons for HS-173 and gefitinib combinations in each cell line and for HS-173 and afatinib combination in UM-SCC-59 were performed but are not shown given the lack of significant interaction term. (Rebucci et al, 2011;D'Amato et al, 2014;Lattanzio et al, 2015) or the reversible EGFR inhibitors (e.g., gefitinib, erlotinib) (Young et al, 2013;Anisuzzaman et al, 2017). One exception is a recent report from Silva-Oliveira et al (2017) that examined the responses to PI3K pathway inhibitors (including AKT inhibitor MK-2206) with two different irreversible EGFR inhibitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when we look at BKM120, the study of Kong et al investigated the effect of BKM120 in PIK3CA hotspot mutated and wild type cell lines and it was concluded that BKM120 exhibit potent activity in both 30 . Since the value of PIK3CA status as predictive biomarker is still unknown according to Anizussaman et al and we had limited availability of HNSCC cell lines with a PIK3CA mutation, we did not incorporate a PIK3CA-mutated cell line in our experimental set-up 15,[31][32][33][34][35] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale for combining pathways inhibitors to prevent PI3Ki resistance has been shown to achieve extended response in pre-clinical HNSCC models. For example, by simultaneously blocking mTORC2 [ 30 , 31 ], human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) [ 32 , 33 ], Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [ 34 , 35 ], Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) [ 36 ], Extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) [ 37 ], and AXL [ 22 ]. Previously, Vora et al [ 23 ] and others [ 26 ] described in both pre-clinical breast cancer models and in patients, that resistance to BYL719 is mediated by sustained activation of mTORC1 that regulates the CDK 4/6–Rb axis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%