1996
DOI: 10.1179/joc.1996.8.5.358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In VitroActivity of Meropenem against Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae andPseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract: The in-vitro susceptibilities of a total of 174 ciprofloxacin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were determined. According to the BSAC and NCCLS breakpoints, meropenem, aztreonam, ceftibuten, ceftazidime, imipenem and cefotaxime were the most active (> 90%) antimicrobial agents tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Susceptibility of these strains to piperacillin/tazobactam, cefpodoxime and cefixime (84.96%) was higher than that to tobramycin, gentamicin and fosfomycin (50-75%). More than 90%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More studies need to be conducted to assess the effectiveness of this drug and the possibility of its use in clinical practice. Some studies report that combining meropenem and ciprofloxacin can have a synergistic effect against some clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa (Erdem et al, 2002, Erdem et al, 2003, Siqueira et al, 2014, Pankuch et al, 2008, GarciaRodriguez et al, 1996) which could be tested on our ex vivo porcine keratitis model in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More studies need to be conducted to assess the effectiveness of this drug and the possibility of its use in clinical practice. Some studies report that combining meropenem and ciprofloxacin can have a synergistic effect against some clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa (Erdem et al, 2002, Erdem et al, 2003, Siqueira et al, 2014, Pankuch et al, 2008, GarciaRodriguez et al, 1996) which could be tested on our ex vivo porcine keratitis model in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%