2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5040268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ tuning of individual position-controlled nanowire quantum dots via laser-induced intermixing

Abstract: We demonstrate an in-situ technique to tune the emission energy of semiconductor quantum dots. The technique is based on laser-induced atomic intermixing applied to nanowire quantum dots grown using a site-selective process that allows for the deterministic tuning of individual emitters. A tuning range of up to 15 meV is obtained with a precision limited by the laser exposure time. A distinct saturation of the energy shift is observed, which suggests an intermixing mechanism relying on grown-in defects that ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some nanowire quantum dots have also been reported [22] to show negative biexciton binding energies of about -1.5 meV and a number of effects have not yet been accounted for in the modelling. For example, studies of laser-induced atom intermixing [64] highlight the possibility of diffusion processes and suggests the existence of some defects. Furthermore, as in Stranski-Krastanov-grown quantum dots, there may be a tendency for As atoms to cluster so that the distribution is no longer uniform within one monolayer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some nanowire quantum dots have also been reported [22] to show negative biexciton binding energies of about -1.5 meV and a number of effects have not yet been accounted for in the modelling. For example, studies of laser-induced atom intermixing [64] highlight the possibility of diffusion processes and suggests the existence of some defects. Furthermore, as in Stranski-Krastanov-grown quantum dots, there may be a tendency for As atoms to cluster so that the distribution is no longer uniform within one monolayer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, easy incorporation of coherent optical control is necessary. Our choice of nanowire QDs, motivated here by the deterministic positioning and high extraction efficiency, can potentially be individually tuned using strain [55][56][57] but the dangling bonds at the nanowire sidewalls likely will remain an obstacle to reduce charge noise and the nanowire geometry hinders resonant laser excitation in the dark-field configuration. Ideally, the emitters would be incorporated into a heterostructure device with individual contacts for each spatial position in the array to provide charge control, control of the emitter energy, charge-environment stabilization, and suppression of solid-state environmental noise [58,59].…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, easy incorporation of coherent optical control is necessary. Our choice of nanowire QDs, motivated here by the deterministic positioning and high extraction efficiency, can potentially be individually tuned using strain [62][63][64], but the dangling bonds at the nanowire sidewalls likely will remain an obstacle to reduce charge noise and the nanowire geometry hinders resonant laser excitation in the dark-field configuration. Ideally, the emitters would be incorporated into a heterostructure device with individual contacts for each spatial position in the array to provide charge control, control of the emitter energy, charge environment stabilization, and suppression of solid-state environmental noise [65,66].…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%