“…By deconvolution of the TPD profile (Figure 4 b), we estimated 0.278 mmol g cat −1 for the Lewis‐NH 3 and 0.780 mmol g cat −1 for the Brønsted‐NH 4 + . These values, divided by the Cu‐loading in the tested sample, give NH 3 /Cu ratios of 1.00 and 2.80, respectively; adding weakly‐desorbed NH 3 (0.613 mmol g cat −1 ; negligible rig contribution by a blank test, Figure S6) to the Lewis‐adsorbates, the former of which actually represents additional NH 3 molecules coordinated with Cu‐ions when gaseous NH 3 exists and solvates Cu, [6, 9] leads to an NH 3 /Cu ratio of ≈3.20, that is in line with a Cu II (OH)(NH 3 ) 3 configuration widely documented in literature [4b, 6, 9, 13] . Further, as revealed by using transient CO oxidation as a probe reaction in a recent work from some of us, [16] enhanced mobility of Cu II OH conferred by NH 3 ‐ligands significantly promotes CO oxidation by favoring the formation of dual‐site Cu II ‐NH 3 complexes, experimentally confirming the ability of Cu II (OH)(NH 3 ) 3 , a single‐charge cluster, to diffuse between CHA cages.…”