1985
DOI: 10.1080/00380768.1985.10557473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situMeasurement of Rooting Density by Micro-Rhizotron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Root tracings were scanned, and root length in each diameter category was recorded for each measurement session using image analysis software (WinRHIZO Tron, Regent Instruments, Canada). Rhizotron root length was converted to root mass per unit ground area using the following different methods: Method 1 (Taylor et al 1970;Itoh 1985;Tingey et al 2000): The area of the two-dimensional plane of soil sampled by the rhizotrons is known (rhizotron width× length), but without some assumption of how far this plane extends into the bulk soil, root length observed at the rhizotron screen cannot be converted into root length per unit soil volume and ground area. However, direct measurements of ingrowth core root length per unit soil volume were made (see Supplementary measurements, above), and so the soil volume that was assumed to be 'sampled' by the rhizotron screen was altered until the mean value of rhizotron root length production per unit soil volume was equal to that derived from ingrowth cores.…”
Section: Rhizotron Methodology and Unit Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Root tracings were scanned, and root length in each diameter category was recorded for each measurement session using image analysis software (WinRHIZO Tron, Regent Instruments, Canada). Rhizotron root length was converted to root mass per unit ground area using the following different methods: Method 1 (Taylor et al 1970;Itoh 1985;Tingey et al 2000): The area of the two-dimensional plane of soil sampled by the rhizotrons is known (rhizotron width× length), but without some assumption of how far this plane extends into the bulk soil, root length observed at the rhizotron screen cannot be converted into root length per unit soil volume and ground area. However, direct measurements of ingrowth core root length per unit soil volume were made (see Supplementary measurements, above), and so the soil volume that was assumed to be 'sampled' by the rhizotron screen was altered until the mean value of rhizotron root length production per unit soil volume was equal to that derived from ingrowth cores.…”
Section: Rhizotron Methodology and Unit Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While rhizotrons also provide data on root length (e.g. : Field studies: Itoh 1985;Sword et al 1996;West et al 2003;Davis et al 2004. Reviews: Vogt et al 1998Hendricks et al 2006), the unit of measurement (root length per unit area of observation screen) is not easily integrated into models of plant water and nutrient uptake.…”
Section: Root Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3.0-mm image depth of field generated a 2002 ambient minirhizotron root-production estimate of 119.2 g m À2 , consistent with expectations. This depth of field estimate, which has been used in previous studies (Sanders and Brown 1978;Itoh 1985), was used in all of our calculations. We converted root length/minirhizotron to root length/m 2 using 3.0 mm as the image depth of field and by treating each image volume as indicative of rootlength density for the corresponding soil-surface area to the maximum depth of live root appearance during the course of the study (Johnson et al 2001).…”
Section: Scaling Of Minirhizotron Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%