2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8349.00108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IA. W. Moore

Abstract: There are criteria of ineffability whereby, even if the concept of ineffability can never serve to modify truth, it can sometimes (non-trivially) serve to modify other things, specifically understanding. This allows for a reappraisal of the dispute between those who adopt a traditional reading of Wittgenstein's Tractatus and those who adopt the new reading recently championed by Diamond, Conant, and others. By maintaining that what the nonsense in the Tractatus is supposed to convey is ineffable understanding,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… See Sullivan (2003 andMoore (2003Moore ( , 2011Moore ( , 2013. 3 See, for exampleMcManus (2015: 126-127).4 Sullivan's (2013: 257) misgiving regarding this definition notwithstanding.5 Moore (1997: 16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Sullivan (2003 andMoore (2003Moore ( , 2011Moore ( , 2013. 3 See, for exampleMcManus (2015: 126-127).4 Sullivan's (2013: 257) misgiving regarding this definition notwithstanding.5 Moore (1997: 16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%