2000
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.20.15.5490-5502.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HMG-I/Y, a New c-Myc Target Gene and Potential Oncogene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
230
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
7
230
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] The putative oncogene, HMGIY (high mobility group protein isoforms I and Y), localized to 6p21 has been proposed to play a role in the development of a number of these neoplasms. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] An identical t(17;17)(q12;p13) was seen in two previous studies. 7,9 Interestingly, an inversion of chromosome 17 [inv(17)(p13q11.2-12)] involving similar breakpoints was observed in case 37 of the present study (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] The putative oncogene, HMGIY (high mobility group protein isoforms I and Y), localized to 6p21 has been proposed to play a role in the development of a number of these neoplasms. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] An identical t(17;17)(q12;p13) was seen in two previous studies. 7,9 Interestingly, an inversion of chromosome 17 [inv(17)(p13q11.2-12)] involving similar breakpoints was observed in case 37 of the present study (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This suggests that, in humans, AKNA gene lesions could be a determining risk factor for how neutrophilmediated inflammatory reactions resolve into acute syndromes and/or neoplastic disorders [59]. Although we make no parallel between AKNA and HMG proteins, we speculate that given the evidence of HMGA1 direct contribution to neoplastic transformation [60][61][62], the shared involvement in inflammation [54], and the linkage of SNP at human AKNA AT-hook domain with higher risk for cervical cancer [23], physiopathological cooperation is at least plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 -32 In addition to these genes, many important regulators of cell cyclerelated events including centrosome separation/segregation (eg, ARK2), 33 kinetochore association (eg, CENF), 34 functional components of mitotic check points (eg, CENPE and TTK orMps1), 35,36 chromatin association and DNA replication (eg, HMG-I/Y, chromatin assembly factor-I (p150), DNA helicase and DHFR). [37][38][39] A group of genes that promotes G 2 /M transit or are expressed in the M phase of the cell cycle, including CYCLIN-A, CDC2, CDC25C, and SAK, 40 -42 were also up-regulated. These results suggest that t(14;18)-negative GCB-DLBCL is significantly more mitotically active than the t(14;18)-positive cases, and indicates that the two cytogenetic subsets have distinctive biological characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%