Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy has changed the paradigm in resectable gastric cancer. S-1 is an oral chemotherapeutic with promising efficacy in Asia. However, comparisons with close observation or platinum-based doublets post D2 gastrectomy have been less reported.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with D2-dissected stage IB-III gastric cancer who received S-1 (S-1, n=64), platinum-based doublets (P, n=95) and operation with close observation (OBS, n=110) from Jan 2013 to Oct 2018. A propensity score matching was used to compare for recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survivals (OS). Adverse reactions, dosage, and associated factors for S-1 are also discussed.Results: In a median follow-up of 42.5 months, Group S-1 had a comparable survival to that of P and OBS. (median RFS/OS: S-1 vs. P, 24.4/37.4 vs. 39.1/62.1 months, HR=1.12/1.22, p=0.667/0.514; S-1 vs. OBS, 23.6/37.4 vs. 24.0/64.6 months, HR=1.17/1.23, p=0.554/0.499). However, in patients with N2-3 or stage IIIB/IIIC disease, P significantly improved survival as compared with S-1. Conversely, S-1 was comparable to P and superior to OBS in stage IB-IIIA or N0-1 disease. S-1 was well-tolerated with a relative dose intensity of 73.6%, a median duration of 8.3 months and associated with less adverse reactions as compared with P. In the subgroup analysis, P was favored in stage III, N2-3 or T3-4 disease wherase patients with Helicobacter Pylori infection had a better survival when treated with S-1.Conclusions: Adjuvant S-1 correlated with comparable survival rates but fewer adverse reactions as compared with platinum-based doublets. Patients with low to moderate risk of recurrence and Helicobacter pylori infection derived benefits from S-1 while platinum-based doublets were favored in advanced cases. The study provides additional information about adjuvant S-1 in patients with selected risk of recurrence.