2018
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘I have not witnessed it personally myself, but…’: Epistemics in managing talk on racism against immigrants in Ireland

Abstract: Social psychologists who study racism or prejudice argue that various versions of these are constructed in ways to suppress or minimise their relevance. However, researchers have not particularly examined how knowledge-claims about racism can also be variously made or negotiated in attending to the relevance of racism. We offer such an examination through a discursive psychological analysis of interview talk with Irish nationals on immigration, since in these settings issues of immigration and racism are not r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complainers and recipients of complaints treat the categorization of the actors as central to negotiating racism. Sambaraju and Minescu (2019) show that participants treat knowledge about racism in the context of immigration as tied to their own categorization as migrants or citizens.…”
Section: Membership Categorization Analysis Race Categories and Racismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Complainers and recipients of complaints treat the categorization of the actors as central to negotiating racism. Sambaraju and Minescu (2019) show that participants treat knowledge about racism in the context of immigration as tied to their own categorization as migrants or citizens.…”
Section: Membership Categorization Analysis Race Categories and Racismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Extensive discursive research points to denials and suppression of accusations of racism van Dijk, 1992). Sambaraju and Minescu (2018) show that majority group members do not treat themselves as having the rights to make claims about racism that ethnic minority members may face. In the present case, majority group members treat their majority status to mean having rights and responsibilities to be antiracist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denials of prejudice are then rhetorically significant as they mitigate inferences of irrationality. Other approaches based in discursive psychology (in distinction to critical discursive approaches) similarly locate the examination of race and racism in individuals' orientations in their interactions and social practices (Goodman, 2014; Sambaraju & Minescu, 2019).…”
Section: Studying Race Racism and Whitenessmentioning
confidence: 99%