<i>Haumanu ipukarea, ki uta ki tai</i>: (re)connecting to landscape and reviving the sense of belonging for health and wellbeing

Marques, Bruno; McIntosh, Jacqueline; Hatton, William

doi:10.1080/23748834.2018.1514754

Cited by 18 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The high demand for provisioning services such as water supply, irrigation, and hydro-power deteriorates the integrity of ecological processes that affect river-basin regulatory and supporting services. Landscapes are the signatures of ecological, economic, social, and cultural interactions [156,157]. The modification of river landscape impacts the landscape features having prime importance in the life of the indigenous people and riparian population [156,157].…”

Section: The Ecological and Socio-cultural Aspect Of Ecosystem Servicmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Landscapes are the signatures of ecological, economic, social, and cultural interactions [156,157]. The modification of river landscape impacts the landscape features having prime importance in the life of the indigenous people and riparian population [156,157]. The religious belief, folklore, customs, and traditions of these people are closely entwined and are influenced by riverine landscapes.…”

Section: The Ecological and Socio-cultural Aspect Of Ecosystem Servicmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Anthropogenic Modifications and River Ecosystem Services: A Landscape Perspective

Ekka

Pande

Jiang

et al. 2020

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The process of development has led to the modification of river landscapes. This has created imbalances between ecological, economic, and socio-cultural uses of ecosystem services (ESs), threatening the biotic and social integrity of rivers. Anthropogenic modifications influence river landscapes on multiple scales, which impact river-flow regimes and thus the production of river ESs. Despite progress in developing approaches for the valuation ecosystem goods and services, the ecosystem service research fails to acknowledge the biophysical structure of river landscape where ecosystem services are generated. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to synthesize the literature to develop the understanding of the biocomplexity of river landscapes and its importance in ecosystem service research. The review is limited to anthropogenic modifications from catchment to reach scale which includes inter-basin water transfer, change in land-use pattern, sub-surface modifications, groundwater abstractions, stream channelization, dams, and sand mining. Using 86 studies, the paper demonstrates that river ESs largely depend on the effective functioning of biophysical processes, which are linked with the geomorphological, ecological, and hydrological characteristics of river landscapes. Further, the ESs are linked with the economic, ecological, and socio-cultural aspect. The papers show that almost all anthropogenic modifications have positive impact on economic value of ESs. The ecological and socio-cultural values are negatively impacted by anthropogenic modifications such as dams, inter-basin water transfer, change in land-use pattern, and sand mining. The socio-cultural impact of ground-water abstraction and sub-surface modifications are not found in the literature examined here. Further, the ecological and socio-cultural aspects of ecosystem services from stakeholders’ perspective are discussed. We advocate for linking ecosystem service assessment with landscape signatures considering the socio-ecological interactions.

show abstract

Section: The Ecological and Socio-cultural Aspect Of Ecosystem Servicmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Ecological and Socio-cultural Aspect Of Ecosystem Servicmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anthropogenic Modifications and River Ecosystem Services: A Landscape Perspective

Ekka

Pande

Jiang

et al. 2020

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Intergenerational knowledge can be transformative when generations have an opportunity to add to the knowledge base through their lived experiences. The transmission of mātauranga can be done in myriad ways, even by creating digital reference tools about a place, its resources and its peoples (Marques et al 2018;Reihana et al 2019). At Waitaua, intergenerational knowledge pertaining to cultural practices and histories is embedded in the landscapes along the river.…”

Section: Intergenerational Knowledgementioning

confidence: 99%

Kaitiakitanga, place and the urban restoration agenda

Walker¹,

Wehi²,

Nelson³

et al. 2019

NZJE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ko te oranga o te tangata kei roto i tōna tūhono ki tōna taiao. Mō te hunga Māori o Aotearoa, ko te whakapapa ki a Ranginui rāua ko Papatūānuku te ara whakaū i tō tātou hononga ki ngā atua Māori me ō rātou tini tamariki. Ko ngā atua ngā pou o te ao tūroa e kaha whāngai, e kaha manāki ana i te hunga Māori me tōna ahurea. Koia nei ko te orokohanga mai o te kaitiakitanga. Mā ngā mahi ā-rēhia, ngā tikanga nō tuawhakarere, ka ora ai te hononga o te tangata ki tōna taiao. Heoi nō ngā tau hou, kua ūhia tēnei momo mana kaitiaki ki runga i te hunga tangata, hei tiaki hei manāki i ngā mokopuna o te taiao. I roto hoki i ēnei tau hou kua hipa, kua nui ake te hunga Māori kua hūnuku ki ngā taone o Aotearoa. Ko te nuinga nō iwi kē, e noho ana i raro i te korowai manāki o ngā hunga mana whenua o ērā taone. Ka mutu, kua muia hoki te taone i ngā kino hauropi, ā, kua mōtū te hiranga o te taiao ki te oranga o te tangata noho taone. Nā te nui o ngā pēhitanga ki te taiao o te taone, kua whakaoho ake ngā mahi haumanu hauropi e te hunga putaiao. Heoi, tē whakaū i ngā uara Māori ki ēnei mahi whakahaumanu. Ko te whāinga matua o tēnei tuhinga, he arohaehae i te awenga o te kaitiakitanga ki te taone. Ko tā matou he whakawā i te huanga o te kaitiakitanga ki ngā mahi whakahaumanu hauropi i te taiao o te taone. Mā te tātari i ngā momo tauira o te kaitiakitanga ka kite i ōna aho me te hiranga o ēnei aho ki te whāinga matua o te manaaki i te taiao. Me te aha, ko te mātauranga taketake, te matauranga a te Māori pea te rongoa hei whakarauora i te ao tūroa.

show abstract

“…The combination of social, cultural, economic, and ecological factors aims to benefit and support both the land and its people and living with nature implies the guardianship of both land and people as sacred. 32 Despite its Western origins, Zealandia now offers a unique platform for the exploration and development of a truly bicultural landscape. It fosters ki uta ki tai, weaving the landscape to the sea via the Kaiwharawhara stream ( Fig.…”

Section: Journal Of Landscape Architecture / 1-2019 J a C Q U E L I Nmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bicultural landscapes and ecological restoration in the compact city: The case of Zealandia as a sustainable ecosanctuary

Marques

McIntosh

Hatton

et al. 2019

Journal of Landscape Architecture

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Haumanu ipukarea, ki uta ki tai: (re)connecting to landscape and reviving the sense of belonging for health and wellbeing

Cited by 18 publications

References 11 publications

Anthropogenic Modifications and River Ecosystem Services: A Landscape Perspective

Anthropogenic Modifications and River Ecosystem Services: A Landscape Perspective

Kaitiakitanga, place and the urban restoration agenda

Bicultural landscapes and ecological restoration in the compact city: The case of Zealandia as a sustainable ecosanctuary

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About