2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5931.2007.00431.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?: A Clash of Interpretations Regarding Stanley Kramer's Film on the Subject of Interracial Marriage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Her analysis identified a range of themes that characterized these relationships, but did not compare their representation to mono-ethnic couples in the same films. Others, such as Harris and Toplin (2007), have described interethnic intimacy as portrayed in one film (Stanley Kramer's Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?) or a small number of films (e.g.…”
Section: Cinematic Engagements With Inter-ethnic Intimacymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Her analysis identified a range of themes that characterized these relationships, but did not compare their representation to mono-ethnic couples in the same films. Others, such as Harris and Toplin (2007), have described interethnic intimacy as portrayed in one film (Stanley Kramer's Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?) or a small number of films (e.g.…”
Section: Cinematic Engagements With Inter-ethnic Intimacymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Due to the contentiousness of this issue in American society, Robert Brent Toplin, co-author of Guess Who's Coming to Dinner? A Clash of Interpretations Regarding Stanley Kramer's Film on the Subject of Interracial Marriage [1] argues that the film's discussion of interracial marriage was revolutionary for the period and only briefly mentions how some aspects of the film could be construed as a reflection of American society at large. However, closer investigation of the film demonstrates the contrary; while some aspects of Kramer's dramatization were progressive and influential for the era, the film more accurately serves as a reflection of the larger social and political context of 1960s America in regards to both attitudes of opposition and acceptance of interracial marriage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%