2023
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GaiaData Release 3

Abstract: Context. The chemo-physical parametrisation of stellar spectra is essential for understanding the nature and evolution of stars and of Galactic stellar populations. A worldwide observational effort from the ground has provided, in one century, an extremely heterogeneous collection of chemical abundances for about two million stars in total, with fragmentary sky coverage. Aims. This situation is revolutionised by the Gaia third data release (DR3), which contains the parametrisation of Radial Velocity Spectromet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
61
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(36 reference statements)
6
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also report relatively good agreement in terms of effective temperatures and extinctions between GSP-Phot and ESP-HS for hot stars (T eff > 7500K), which is used for the OB sample definitions in Gaia Collaboration, and Gaia Collaboration, Creevey et al (2022). Recio-Blanco et al (2022) report good agreement between results from GSP-Phot (low-resolution BP/RP spectra) and GSP-Spec (RVS spectra) for effective temperatures and surface gravities. Gaia Collaboration, Creevey et al (2022) demonstrate that when selecting solar-like stars from GSP-Spec results, the colours of the resulting candidates are in good agreement with those of known solar twins for stars where A 0 < 0.001mag according to GSP-Phot.…”
Section: Further Validation Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…We also report relatively good agreement in terms of effective temperatures and extinctions between GSP-Phot and ESP-HS for hot stars (T eff > 7500K), which is used for the OB sample definitions in Gaia Collaboration, and Gaia Collaboration, Creevey et al (2022). Recio-Blanco et al (2022) report good agreement between results from GSP-Phot (low-resolution BP/RP spectra) and GSP-Spec (RVS spectra) for effective temperatures and surface gravities. Gaia Collaboration, Creevey et al (2022) demonstrate that when selecting solar-like stars from GSP-Spec results, the colours of the resulting candidates are in good agreement with those of known solar twins for stars where A 0 < 0.001mag according to GSP-Phot.…”
Section: Further Validation Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…We also report relatively good agreement in terms of effective temperatures and extinctions between GSP-Phot and ESP-HS for hot stars (T eff > 7500K), which is used for the OB sample definitions in Gaia Collaboration, and Gaia Collaboration, Creevey et al (2022). Recio-Blanco et al (2022) report good agreement between results from GSP-Phot (low-resolution BP/RP spectra) and GSP-Spec (RVS spectra) for effective temperatures and surface gravities. Gaia Collaboration, Creevey et al (2022) demonstrate that when selecting solar-like stars from GSP-Spec results, the colours of the resulting candidates are in good agreement with those of known solar twins for stars where A 0 < 0.001mag according to GSP-Phot.…”
Section: Further Validation Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In Gaia DR3, the Gaia archive provides GSP-Phot results for 471 million sources with apparent magnitude G ≤ 19. We also draw attention to a second module of the CU8 Apsis chain, the General Stellar Parameterizer from Spectroscopy (GSP-Spec; Recio-Blanco et al 2022), which is also designed to characterise single stars in Gaia DR3 but using the higher resolution RVS spectra (Seabroke et al 2022) instead of the low-resolution BP/RP spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CU6 therefore used parameters from the preliminary CU8 run. This CU8 run used an earlier version of the GSP-Phot (Andrae et al 2022) and GSP-Spec (Recio-Blanco et al 2022) pipelines. GSP-Phot used DR2 photometric data instead of the better-quality and more detailed DR3 BP/RP data, while GSP-Spec used RVS spectra from the preliminary CU6 run (discussed in Sect.…”
Section: Sta Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%