2017
DOI: 10.1094/asbcj-2017-3321-01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusarium Profiling and Barley Malt Gushing Propensity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of the malting barley DNA samples gave first preliminary evidence on the growing potential of C. rosea within a small scale malting process. This is comparable to the growth potential of several Fusarium species, including F. graminearum , as previously studied in the same process by Virkajärvi et al (2017). The authors determined the amount of Fusarium sp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of the malting barley DNA samples gave first preliminary evidence on the growing potential of C. rosea within a small scale malting process. This is comparable to the growth potential of several Fusarium species, including F. graminearum , as previously studied in the same process by Virkajärvi et al (2017). The authors determined the amount of Fusarium sp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…DNA, respectively, were processed. The grain samples were malted in a computer controlled micromalting equipment (Hulo Engineering, Helsinki, Finland) with a separate drum for each sample, as described by Virkajärvi et al (2017). Prior to steeping, the grain samples were inoculated with the C. rosea strain ACM941 at 10 6 conidia/kg in a volume of 10 ml sterile water and incubated at 25°C in the dark for 24 h (moisture content 30%) in order to activate the BCA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of environmental factors can impact the estimation of mycotoxin risk based only on the Fusarium DNA levels. Another application for the FusE method is the assessment of the gushing risk in malting barley such as that studied by Virkajärvi et al [26], where a higher Fusarium DNA level was associated with a higher gushing risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greatest economic consequence in barley from FHB occurs when malt quality standards are not met due to the accumulation of mycotoxins, especially deoxynivalenol (DON). For instance, the presence of DON increases gushing risk in the malting process [2]. The amount of DON in barley can often be higher than would be expected for an equivalent level of FHB in wheat, because of the retention of the lemma and palea which is floret tissue that remains attached to the barley kernel in the harvesting and malting process [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%