2001
DOI: 10.1115/1.1421112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamentals of Vibrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
715
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 869 publications
(729 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
715
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting distribution of forces and displacements in the 2D frame (D stands for the dead load; L implies the live load, E denotes the load of earthquake, and W represents the wind load), according to the Iranian codes [4,6].by considering the typical distributions of live and dead loads as displayed in Figure 3, and putting it besides the distribution in Figure 2 and also Eq. (1), and not forgetting the superposition principle in linear analyses [7], it would be apparent that pseudo-static analysis is a static analysis against loads that do not change, unless at structural nodes (see Figure 1). Consequently, in view of the considerations in the simplest column-beam theory [8] and strength of materials [9], it is reasonable to except sufficient accuracies, when locating the finite elements nodes on the structural nodes.…”
Section: Structural Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting distribution of forces and displacements in the 2D frame (D stands for the dead load; L implies the live load, E denotes the load of earthquake, and W represents the wind load), according to the Iranian codes [4,6].by considering the typical distributions of live and dead loads as displayed in Figure 3, and putting it besides the distribution in Figure 2 and also Eq. (1), and not forgetting the superposition principle in linear analyses [7], it would be apparent that pseudo-static analysis is a static analysis against loads that do not change, unless at structural nodes (see Figure 1). Consequently, in view of the considerations in the simplest column-beam theory [8] and strength of materials [9], it is reasonable to except sufficient accuracies, when locating the finite elements nodes on the structural nodes.…”
Section: Structural Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2D frame in Figure 4 with structural members introduced in Table 1, located on a type II soil [4], and designed according to Iranian codes (see [4][5][6][7][10][11][12]) is undergone pseudostatic seismic analysis, considering the beam column members using Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, and elements sized according to Figure 1. Separately, the much more accurate results are obtained using about twenty times smaller elements.…”
Section: Numerical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linearised system is forming decoupled PDEs, whereas considering the B.C.s (Eq. 7-9), it can be shown that the equations are also self-adjoint, since the equations describe the well-known elastic motions in bending and torsion with typical BCs [29]. Therefore, the linear mode shapes are orthogonal to each other and also the linear modal equations decoupled.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Using Eq. (22a) in (22b), the system can be decoupled easily, and the solution of these equations is a trivial problem given by [29],…”
Section: Solution Of First-order Approximation For Rigid Body With Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation