<i>Frankliniella fusca</i> resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides: an emerging challenge for cotton pest management in the eastern United States

Huseth, Anders S.; Chappell, Thomas M.; Langdon, Kevin W.; Morsello, Shannon; Martin, S. H.; Greene, Jeremy K.; Herbert, Ames; Jacobson, Alana L.; Reay‐Jones, Francis P. F.; Timothy, Reed; Reisig, Dominic; Roberts, Phillip M.; Smith, Ron; Kennedy, George G.

doi:10.1002/ps.4232

Cited by 71 publications

(87 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In a previous study, the type of host plant (i.e. field‐grown cotton or non‐crop weed species) had no detectible relationship with the measured resistance status of the population, indicating that collection from treated host plants would not significantly alter the population‐level characterization of NST resistance measured in the laboratory. Frankliniella fusca populations were maintained on white cabbage ( Brassica oleracea var.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 83%

“…The neonicotinoid‐susceptible, North Carolina State University laboratory F. fusca colony (NCSU) was maintained in the laboratory under the same conditions as the field populations. Thiamethoxam and imidacloprid resistance was characterized in each population using the multiple‐dose, diet‐based bioassay approach described in Huseth et al Briefly, eight adult female F. fusca were placed in 1.5‐mL microcentrifuge tubes (#05–408‐130; Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) capped with a sachet constructed using the excised cap of the tube and a 2 × 2 cm square of Parafilm (#PM992; Bemis Co., Neenah, WI, USA). The sachets contained 155 μL of a 3% sucrose +0.05% green food dye (McCormick & Co. Inc., Hunt Valley, MD, USA) solution that included a known concentration of formulated imidacloprid (Gaucho® 600FS; 600 g imidacloprid L −1 ; Bayer CropScience, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) or thiamethoxam (Cruiser® 5FS; 600 g thiamethoxam L −1 ; Syngenta Crop Protection, Greensboro, NC, USA).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In cotton, NSTs (imidacloprid and thiamethoxam) provide systemic insecticidal protection to cotton seedlings during this period of susceptibility to thrips damage . However, declining NST performance against F. fusca on seedling cotton in the mid‐south and southeastern USA has been reported, and resistance to both imidacloprid and thiamethoxam in F. fusca populations has been confirmed in both regions …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Temporal efficacy of neonicotinoid seed treatments against Frankliniella fusca on cotton

D'Ambrosio

Huseth

Kennedy

2018

Pest Management Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

NSTs reduce the number of F. fusca larvae on younger seedlings, but this effect declines as seedlings age. The duration of efficacy is shorter against neonicotinoid-resistant populations. Neonicotinoid resistance in cotton-infesting F. fusca populations may be accelerated by this time-dependent decrease in efficacy, which likely encourages low-dose exposure to these insecticides. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 83%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Temporal efficacy of neonicotinoid seed treatments against Frankliniella fusca on cotton

D'Ambrosio

Huseth

Kennedy

2018

Pest Management Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, seed treatment for avoiding the early establishment of whitefly populations, control of whitefly using pesticides on cotton crop, eradication of weeds (alternative host for virus), better health of the plant through providing balance dose of fertilizers, biological agents, etc. were the immediate measures taken to control this disease (Narula et al, 1999; Cook et al, 2011; Cuthbertson et al, 2011; Yuan et al, 2012; Basit et al, 2013; Smalling et al, 2013; Horowitz and Ishaaya, 2014; Hollis, 2015; Huseth et al, 2016; Follett, 2017). …”

Section: Strategies For Controlling the Diseasementioning

confidence: 99%

Genetics and Genomics of Cotton Leaf Curl Disease, Its Viral Causal Agents and Whitefly Vector: A Way Forward to Sustain Cotton Fiber Security

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) after its first epidemic in 1912 in Nigeria, has spread to different cotton growing countries including United States, Pakistan, India, and China. The disease is of viral origin—transmitted by the whitefly Bemisia tabaci, which is difficult to control because of the prevalence of multiple virulent viral strains or related species. The problem is further complicated as the CLCuD causing virus complex has a higher recombination rate. The availability of alternate host crops like tomato, okra, etc., and practicing mixed type farming system have further exaggerated the situation by adding synergy to the evolution of new viral strains and vectors. Efforts to control this disease using host plant resistance remained successful using two gene based-resistance that was broken by the evolution of new resistance breaking strain called Burewala virus. Development of transgenic cotton using both pathogen and non-pathogenic derived approaches are in progress. In future, screening for new forms of host resistance, use of DNA markers for the rapid incorporation of resistance into adapted cultivars overlaid with transgenics and using genome editing by CRISPR/Cas system would be instrumental in adding multiple layers of defense to control the disease—thus cotton fiber production will be sustained.

show abstract

“…Nationwide losses of nearly 10.9 million kg (50,000 bales) from thrips damage have been reported historically, requiring anywhere from $25 to $40 ha −1 for chemical control (Johnson et al, 2002; Williams, 2011). Traditionally, thrips have been managed using in‐furrow insecticides and seed treatments; however, with the loss of granular aldicarb insecticides in recent years and reports of resistance development to neonicotinoid products, chemical control options have become more limited (Hollis, 2015; Huseth et al, 2016; Layton and Reed, 2011).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Registration of CA 4005 and CA 4006 Cotton Germplasm Lines with Partial Resistance to Feeding Injury from Thrips

Wann

Dever²,

Arnold³

et al. 2017

J of Plant Registrations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) are common pests of cotton (Gossypium spp.) worldwide, typically causing economic damage within the first few weeks after planting of a cotton crop. With the loss of granular aldicarbs and resistance development to other insecticides in recent years, host plant resistance could play an important role in the integrated management of thrips. Two breeding lines originally developed for cold tolerance in the Texas A&M AgriLife Research cotton improvement program at Lubbock, TX, exhibited characteristics associated with thrips tolerance. These G. hirsutum lines, CA 4005 (Reg. No. GP‐1023, PI 681593) and CA 4006 (Reg. No. GP‐1024, PI 681594), are germplasm lines that were subsequently evaluated for potential resistance to thrips feeding injury. Both lines were evaluated in field and greenhouse tests from 2012 to 2014. CA 4005 and CA 4006 consistently displayed greater resistance to thrips feeding injury than the commercial and susceptible checks at the field level. Greenhouse evaluations, however, revealed that these lines are only partially resistant and can be overcome at high thrips densities. Yield potential, high‐volume instrument (HVI) fiber quality, and other agronomic characteristics of CA 4005 and CA 4006 were comparable to the evaluated commercial checks. These germplasm lines exhibited improved thrips resistance and competitive agronomic potential for the Texas High Plains and would be valuable sources of partial thrips resistance in adapted G. hirsutum germplasm.

show abstract

Frankliniella fusca resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides: an emerging challenge for cotton pest management in the eastern United States

Cited by 71 publications

References 13 publications

Temporal efficacy of neonicotinoid seed treatments against Frankliniella fusca on cotton

Temporal efficacy of neonicotinoid seed treatments against Frankliniella fusca on cotton

Genetics and Genomics of Cotton Leaf Curl Disease, Its Viral Causal Agents and Whitefly Vector: A Way Forward to Sustain Cotton Fiber Security

Registration of CA 4005 and CA 4006 Cotton Germplasm Lines with Partial Resistance to Feeding Injury from Thrips

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About