1972
DOI: 10.1063/1.3070964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fourier Methods in Crystallography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This name is inspired by the term`double-phasing' used by Ramachandran & Srinivasan (1970) in reference to SIR and SAD phasing. The rationale behind the phase-o-phrenia algorithm is that the Fourier transform of a constant function [e.g.…”
Section: Unexpected Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This name is inspired by the term`double-phasing' used by Ramachandran & Srinivasan (1970) in reference to SIR and SAD phasing. The rationale behind the phase-o-phrenia algorithm is that the Fourier transform of a constant function [e.g.…”
Section: Unexpected Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An electron-density map obtained through SAD phasing is a superposition of the true electron density and the negative inverse of the true electron density convoluted with the Fourier transform of exp(2i9 sub ) (Ramachandran & Srinivasan, 1970),…”
Section: Unexpected Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another difficulty lies in the fact that many of the early structure determinations carried out in the Soviet Union were on compounds for which the X-ray crystal structures were already known and, indeed, the atomic positions from these structures were often used to phase the electron-diffraction structure-factor magnitudes to allow the computation of electrostatic potential maps. Since it is well known (Ramachandran & Srinivasan, 1970) that a correct set of crystallographic phases applied to permuted structure-factor amplitudes results in a Fourier map with a recognizable crystal structure, this early work unfortunately failed to answer the skeptical criticism of many other structural crystallographers that the measured electron diffraction intensity data by themselves may not be sufficient for an ab initio structure analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron-density syntheses calculated using experimental magnitudes and phases obtained from an available atomic model are known to be strongly biased towards the model, resulting in spurious density features (Raman, 1959;Ramachandran & Srinivasan, 1970;Oppenheim, 1981;Hodel, Kim & Bfiinger, 1992). Significant efforts were made to find a combination of experimental and calculated magnitudes and of calculated phases that reduces this bias (Luzzati, 1953;Main, 1979;Vijayan, 1980;Read, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%