Bergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118960608.gbm00312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flavobacterium

Abstract: Fla.vo.bac.te'ri.um. L. adj. flavus yellow; L. neut. n. bacterium a rod or staff and, in biology, a bacterium (so called because the first ones observed were rod‐shaped); N.L. neut. n. Flavobacterium a yellow bacterium. Bacteroidetes / Flavobacteriia / Flavobacteriales / Flavobacteriaceae / Flavobacterium Straight or slightly curved, single rods with rounded or slightly tapered ends t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 237 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of NWGM are nevertheless regarded as most likely being a consequence of the differing sampling technique, with the vast difference between NWGM and NM/NEGM communities far exceeding expected community variation. For example, Firmicutes dominates faecal bacterial communities across mammal species but the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio was reversed in NWGM and there were increases in aerobic bacteria known to occur in the Arctic environment (Flavobacteriales and Sphingobacteriales), indicating environmental contamination [ 69 , 70 ]. This raises questions about using dried (delayed sampling from dropping) faecal samples in characterizing the gut-associated microbial communities [ 71 , 72 ] and we therefore recommend interpreting microbial community data produced from dried faecal samples cautiously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of NWGM are nevertheless regarded as most likely being a consequence of the differing sampling technique, with the vast difference between NWGM and NM/NEGM communities far exceeding expected community variation. For example, Firmicutes dominates faecal bacterial communities across mammal species but the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio was reversed in NWGM and there were increases in aerobic bacteria known to occur in the Arctic environment (Flavobacteriales and Sphingobacteriales), indicating environmental contamination [ 69 , 70 ]. This raises questions about using dried (delayed sampling from dropping) faecal samples in characterizing the gut-associated microbial communities [ 71 , 72 ] and we therefore recommend interpreting microbial community data produced from dried faecal samples cautiously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chryseobacterium was originally isolated by Vandamme et al . 41 ; since then, many species have been identified in soil, clinical samples, and the guts of insects 42 43 . Recently, Chryseobacterium sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swabs made of pathological material were stained according to Gram with methylene blue solution. Primary inoculation was performed with fragments of affected skin and gill tissue of dead fish into the meat-peptone agar and cultured at 26 °C for 24 h. Subsequently, special nutrient media were inoculated and the pure culture obtained was identified based on morphological, cultural, tinctorial properties (Bernardet & Bowman, 2006). The sensitivity of F. columnare pure culture to antibacterial drugs was studied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%