Fasciola gigantica, F. hepatica and Fasciola intermediate forms: geometric morphometrics and an artificial neural network to help morphological identification

Abstract

Background. Fasciola hepatica and F. gigantica cause fascioliasis in both humans and livestock. Some adult specimens of Fasciola sp. referred to as ''intermediate forms'' based on their genetic traits, are also frequently reported. Simple morphological criteria are unreliable for their specific identification. In previous studies, promising phenotypic identification scores were obtained using morphometrics based on linear measurements (distances, angles, curves) between anatomical features. Such an approach is commonly termed ''traditional'' morphometrics, as opposed to ''modern'' morphometrics, which is based on the coordinates of anatomical points. Methods. Here, we explored the possible improvements that modern methods of morphometrics, including landmark-based and outline-based approaches, could bring to solving the problem of the non-molecular identification of these parasites. F. gigantica and Fasciola intermediate forms suitable for morphometric characterization were selected from Thai strains following their molecular identification. Specimens of F. hepatica were obtained from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (UK). Using these three taxa, we tested the taxonomic signal embedded in traditional linear measurements versus the coordinates of anatomical points (landmark-and outlinebased approaches). Various statistical techniques of validated reclassification were used, based on either the shortest Mahalanobis distance, the maximum likelihood, or the artificial neural network method. Results. Our results revealed that both traditional and modern morphometric approaches can help in the morphological identification of Fasciola sp. We showed that the accuracy of the traditional approach could be improved by selecting a subset of characters among the most contributive ones. The influence of size on discrimination by shape was much more important in traditional than in modern analyses. In our study, the modern approach provided different results according to the type of data: satisfactory when using pseudolandmarks (outlines), less satisfactory when using How to cite this article Sumruayphol S, Siribat P, Dujardin J-P, Dujardin S, Komalamisra C, Thaenkham U. 2020. Fasciola gigantica, F. hepatica and Fasciola intermediate forms: geometric morphometrics and an artificial neural network to help morphological identification. PeerJ 8:e8597 http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8597landmarks. The different reclassification methods provided approximately similar scores, with a special mention to the neural network, which allowed improvements in accuracy by combining data from both morphometric approaches. Conclusion. We conclude that morphometrics, whether traditional or modern, represent a valuable tool to assist in Fasciola species recognition. The general level of accuracy is comparable among the various methods, but their demands on skills and time differ. Based on the outline method, our study could provide the first description of the shape differences between species, highlighting the more globular contours of the ...

Identification of Adult Fasciola spp. Using Matrix-Assisted Laser/Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) Mass Spectrometry

“…Current methods used for the diagnosis of human and veterinary fascioliasis, in particular for the identification of adult worms, rely on morphological analyses of the trematodes [ 16 ], molecular methods (e.g., polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) and sequencing [ 7 , 11 , 17 ]. The latter two approaches have several limitations, including a lack of rigorous standardization of the morphological identification in different settings, relatively high costs and unavailability of PCR-based testing using specific primers for e.g., trematodes outside highly specialized research laboratories.…”

State-of-the-Art Techniques for Diagnosis of Medical Parasites and Arthropods

“…Nowadays, geometric morphometric analysis is increasingly applied to medical parasite diagnoses. Sumruayphol et al (2020) utilized geometric morphometric analysis for the morphological identification of the causative agents of fascioliasis, including F. gigantica , F. hepatica , and Fasciola intermediate forms [ 46 ]. Adult worms of parasites isolated from the infected cattle’s livers were fixed on the glass slides, soaked in 70% ethanol, and stained with Semichon’s acid-carmine.…”

“…The results showed an accuracy of identification of 69%. However, the accuracy increased to 94% when outline-based geometric morphometric analysis was applied, whereas microscopic examination caused an accuracy of identification of 70% [ 46 ]. This study highlighted the advantage of geometric morphometric analysis as a new and highly accurate tool for Fasciola identification.…”

The Unequal Taxonomic Signal of Mosquito Wing Cells

“…Geometric morphometrics of mosquitoes has previously been used to distinguish between genera [ 28 ], between species within the same genus [ 6 , 23 , 29 , 30 ], between populations of a species [ 31 , 32 ], and between sexes of a species [ 29 , 33 ]. Recently, this method was used by our group to discriminate various organisms as diverse as liver flukes [ 34 ], chigger mites [ 35 ] and fireflies [ 23 ].…”