2010
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-10-0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FAS and FASLG Genetic Variants and Risk for Second Primary Malignancy in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Abstract: Background: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter region of the FAS and FASLG may alter the transcriptional activity of these genes. We therefore investigated the association between the FAS and FASLG polymorphisms and risk for second primary malignancy (SPM) after index squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).Methods: We used log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models to assess the association of the four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (FAS -1377 G > A, FAS -670 A > G, FASLG -844… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the association between the FASLG 844 polymorphism and the risk of some cancers has been reported in previous studies, but not for FASLG 124. Previously, we also reported that both FAS 670 AG+GG and FASLG 844 CT+TT variant genotypes were associated with a significantly higher risk of second primary malignancies in patients with index SCCHN compared with the corresponding FAS 670 AA and FASLG 844 CC genotype, although the results of our previous case‐control study indicated that these polymorphisms were not significantly associated with risk of SCCHN . In the current study, however, we observed an association between the FAS 670 AG+GG and FASLG 844 CT+TT variant genotypes and a high risk of recurrence compared with that of their corresponding common homozygous genotypes; no such significant associations were found for the FAS 1377 and FASLG 124 polymorphisms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…For example, the association between the FASLG 844 polymorphism and the risk of some cancers has been reported in previous studies, but not for FASLG 124. Previously, we also reported that both FAS 670 AG+GG and FASLG 844 CT+TT variant genotypes were associated with a significantly higher risk of second primary malignancies in patients with index SCCHN compared with the corresponding FAS 670 AA and FASLG 844 CC genotype, although the results of our previous case‐control study indicated that these polymorphisms were not significantly associated with risk of SCCHN . In the current study, however, we observed an association between the FAS 670 AG+GG and FASLG 844 CT+TT variant genotypes and a high risk of recurrence compared with that of their corresponding common homozygous genotypes; no such significant associations were found for the FAS 1377 and FASLG 124 polymorphisms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…ALPS patients also exhibited increased risk of both hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cancers (9, 11). Furthermore, FAS and FASL gene promoter polymorphisms are associated with decreased Fas expression level and increased risk of both hematopoietic malignancies and non-hematopoietic carcinoma development in humans (12-14). The Fas protein level is high in normal human colon tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, both the Fas and FasL gene promoters are polymorphic, including a G to A substitution at −1377 bp, and A to G substitution at −670 bp at the Fas gene promoter; and C to T substitution at −844 and −124 A to G substitution at the FasL gene promoter. These polymorphisms diminish transcription factor binding to the Fas and FasL promoter to decrease Fas and FasL expression level, resulting in increased risk of cancer development in humans (1419). Moreover, a study with a large cohort of human colorectal cancer patient specimens showed that Fas-mediated apoptosis is an important contributor of tumor regression (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%