1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb00895.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escherichia coli integration host factor stabilizes bacteriophage Mu repressor interactions with operator DNA in vitro

Abstract: Using gel retardation and DNase I protection techniques, we have demonstrated that the Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF) stabilizes the interaction between Mu repressor and its cognate operator-binding sites in vitro. These results are discussed in terms of a model in which IHF may commit the phage to the lytic or lysogenic pathway depending on the occupancy of the operator sites by the repressor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,+6) vir3061 (-23,+13) proposed that binding of IHF to its cognate site located between O1 and 02 provides the right conformation for optimal repressor binding (Vogel et aI., 1991). This was confirmed by both in vivo and in vitro experiments which showed that IHF increases repression by repressor in vivo and facilitates repressor binding to the operators in vitro (Gama, Toussaint & Higgins, 1992;Alazard, B6termier & Chandler, 1992). The host H-NS protein, another nucleoid associated histone-like protein, has similar effects on repression and repressot binding as IHE Its exact mechanism of action is unknown and although it has been proposed that H-NS acts through protein-protein interactions with repressor (Falconi et al, 1991), the possibility remains open that H-NS binds DNA in the operator region, as it does for instance in the rrn promoters (Tippner et al, 1994).…”
Section: Lysogenysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…11,+6) vir3061 (-23,+13) proposed that binding of IHF to its cognate site located between O1 and 02 provides the right conformation for optimal repressor binding (Vogel et aI., 1991). This was confirmed by both in vivo and in vitro experiments which showed that IHF increases repression by repressor in vivo and facilitates repressor binding to the operators in vitro (Gama, Toussaint & Higgins, 1992;Alazard, B6termier & Chandler, 1992). The host H-NS protein, another nucleoid associated histone-like protein, has similar effects on repression and repressot binding as IHE Its exact mechanism of action is unknown and although it has been proposed that H-NS acts through protein-protein interactions with repressor (Falconi et al, 1991), the possibility remains open that H-NS binds DNA in the operator region, as it does for instance in the rrn promoters (Tippner et al, 1994).…”
Section: Lysogenysupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This 30% decrease may be the result of a fraction of StrRAG1 that binds non-specifically to DNA as well as the presence of a high concentration of polyanionic charge contributed by the phosphate groups of DNA, which may affect the overall stability of the complex in the electrophoretic field within the gel matrix. Gel-sieving effects combined with prolonged exposure of protein-DNA complexes to an electrophoretic field (3 h) and electrophoretic buffer may affect the results obtained using the EMSA methodology (40,41). These perturbations may especially affect the interactions between two macromolecular species when opposite charge attraction is a major factor in the stabilization of the complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IHF plays an architectural role in the formation of various nucleoprotein complexes involved in different phenomena such as transcription activation, transcription repression, site-specific recombination, transposition, initiation of DNA replication, and plasmid partition. Binding of IHF could create a loop which stabilizes interaction of Roi with its binding site(s): this is reminiscent of the stabilization of the Mu repressor interaction with its operator (1,12). Interestingly, we noted the presence of an IHF binding site in the gene that encodes the related P1 Ant1 protein (from nt 855 to 867 in the sequence reported by Heisig et al [17]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We speculated that IHF could bind the ihf site within the roi gene and possibly stabilize the interaction of the DNA-binding Roi protein with its target DNA, as happens in Mu repressor-operator interaction (1,12). The target of the Roi protein might then be located near the ihf site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%