2015
DOI: 10.2217/fon.15.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EGFR mutations in lung cancer: from tissue testing to liquid biopsy

Abstract: The presence of EGFR mutations predicts the sensitivity to EGF receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a molecularly defined subset of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. For this reason, EGFR testing of NSCLC is required to provide personalized treatment options and better outcomes for NSCLC patients. As surgery specimens are not available in the majority of NSCLC, other currently available DNA sources are small biopsies and cytological samples, providing however limited and low-quality mate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, only ctDNA-based liquid biopsy has been implemented in routine clinical practice along with European Union approval of EGFR mutation testing for patients with nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The IFUM (Gefitinib [IRESSA] Follow-Up Measure) trial, the European study that led to this approval, reported a sensitivity of 65.7% and a specificity of 99.8% of the approach using a real-time method [25,26]. Further clinical studies are currently ongoing to evaluate whether ctDNA-based liquid biopsy could be exploited for RAS mutation detection in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC).…”
Section: Liquid Biopsy For Genotyping Cancers In the Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, only ctDNA-based liquid biopsy has been implemented in routine clinical practice along with European Union approval of EGFR mutation testing for patients with nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The IFUM (Gefitinib [IRESSA] Follow-Up Measure) trial, the European study that led to this approval, reported a sensitivity of 65.7% and a specificity of 99.8% of the approach using a real-time method [25,26]. Further clinical studies are currently ongoing to evaluate whether ctDNA-based liquid biopsy could be exploited for RAS mutation detection in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC).…”
Section: Liquid Biopsy For Genotyping Cancers In the Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells with this type of TAA will have little chance for immune editing and tumor escape because it is critical for the survival of the tumor [22,23]. Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) fits these parameters and is an oncogenic variant frequently expressed in glioma, lung cancer, and many other types of cancer [24,25]. However, few TAAs meet the criteria, and the majority of targeted antigens are only overexpressed in comparison to normal tissues, which raises concerns about 'on-target, off-tumor' side effects [26,27].…”
Section: Antigen Selection and Binding Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, a number of surface molecules on solid tumors have been discovered, such as folate receptor-α (FR-α) [83], carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) [84,85], HER2 [29,86], EGFR [12,14], EGFRvIII [24,87], prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) [51], prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) [88], fibroblast activation protein (FAP) [89], carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) [26,76], disialoganglioside (GD2) [18], mesothelin [90,91], and IL13Rα2 [34], and some were evaluated in patients with advanced stage solid tumors (table 1). However, early attempts with first-generation CARs for solid tumors did not yield promising results.…”
Section: Clinical Trials Of Carts For Solid Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most NSCLC are not available to collect surgery specimens. CTCs and ctDNA released into the peripheral blood from metastatic deposits is an emerging strategy for NSCLC genotyping (Fenizia et al, 2015). Recently, EGFR mutations in urine and saliva samples have been detected with simpler techniques (Lin et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ctcs Vs Ctnamentioning
confidence: 99%