2008
DOI: 10.1086/591535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial Commentary:Neurosyphilis: Diagnosis and Response to Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation was consistent with a previous finding that serum antibody tests for cardiolipin, like the RPR titer (Musher, 2008) or the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test (Roberts & Emsley, 1995), could indicate treponema pallidum activity. The slow wave activity identified by EEG before treatment was consistent with previous findings in active neurosyphilis (Luo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This observation was consistent with a previous finding that serum antibody tests for cardiolipin, like the RPR titer (Musher, 2008) or the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test (Roberts & Emsley, 1995), could indicate treponema pallidum activity. The slow wave activity identified by EEG before treatment was consistent with previous findings in active neurosyphilis (Luo et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There is a growing consensus that NS patients can benefit from regular benzylpenicillin therapy, and high-dose benzylpenicillin is of proven efficacy at the early stage of NS [27]. Here, we outlined benzylpenicillin-induced neutropenia as a complication of NS treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…374–379], the Hooshmand data suggested that almost twice as many patients had a negative CSF VDRL. The reason for the discrepancy was never elucidated; some argued that the case selection was unreliable [80] while others suggested that this was the result of exposure to antibiotics that have antitreponemal activity [46,81]. In summary, a positive VDRL establishes a diagnosis of neurosyphilis, but a negative VDRL does not exclude it.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%