1977
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1977.68.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

E-unitary covers for inverse semigroups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This parallels the case for certain covers of regular semigroups [1] and E-unitary covers of inverse semigroups [12]. In these cases, the monoid T is replaced by a group G and one is interested in idempotent pure surjective relational morphisms τ : S −→ • G and their inverses τ −1 : G −→ • S. In the inverse case, the associated covers can be described in terms of prehomomorphisms from S into the inverse monoid of all cosets of subgroups of G [12]. For each s ∈ S, the subset sτ is a coset of G; in the left ample case, however, the subsets sτ of T do not appear to enjoy any corresponding property, and so we do not have analogues of these particular results.…”
Section: Relational Morphisms Prehomomorphisms and Proper Coversmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This parallels the case for certain covers of regular semigroups [1] and E-unitary covers of inverse semigroups [12]. In these cases, the monoid T is replaced by a group G and one is interested in idempotent pure surjective relational morphisms τ : S −→ • G and their inverses τ −1 : G −→ • S. In the inverse case, the associated covers can be described in terms of prehomomorphisms from S into the inverse monoid of all cosets of subgroups of G [12]. For each s ∈ S, the subset sτ is a coset of G; in the left ample case, however, the subsets sτ of T do not appear to enjoy any corresponding property, and so we do not have analogues of these particular results.…”
Section: Relational Morphisms Prehomomorphisms and Proper Coversmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The surjective relational morphisms from G to S and their associated covers are described in [12] in terms of dual prehomomorphisms from G to the inverse monoid of all permissible subsets of S. There are analogous results for the left ample case which we describe in the following sections.…”
Section: Relational Morphisms Prehomomorphisms and Proper Coversmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the converse side, any covering : P ! S such that P is E-unitary and P= = G may be completed to essentially the same diagram, giving rise to a strict embedding of S into a factorizable inverse monoid GE [28]. There is a thorough exposition of this equivalence of strict factorizable embeddings with E-unitary covers in [18], especially sections 2.2 and 8.2.…”
Section: The Factorizable Part Of the Symmetric Inverse Monoidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LEMMA 0. 4 (McAlister (1974) and McAlister and Reilly (1977) (a,g),(b,h)eP (a, g) a(b, h) if and only if g = h.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%