2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719169115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drosophila intestinal stem and progenitor cells are major sources and regulators of homeostatic niche signals

Abstract: SignificanceMost epithelia are turned over throughout adult life as cells are lost from the surface and replaced by the proliferation of stem cells. Precise regulation of stem cells by signals from the local microenvironment or niche is important to maintain epithelial homeostasis. Here, using intestinal stem cells of the Drosophila midgut as a model system, we use transcriptome profiling to identify genes expressed specifically in stem and progenitor cells and not their differentiated daughters. We find that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
7
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since our data was collected in experimental conditions without cellular turnover, Dronc seemed to restrain EBs in a quiescent state. To further characterise the differentiation features of Dronc mutant progenitor cells, we next analysed the expression profile of metabolic enzymes highly enriched in ECs [39]. Interestingly, we found that several of these genes were transcriptionally downregulated in our mutant conditions, while others were upregulated (Appendix Fig 3F-H).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our data was collected in experimental conditions without cellular turnover, Dronc seemed to restrain EBs in a quiescent state. To further characterise the differentiation features of Dronc mutant progenitor cells, we next analysed the expression profile of metabolic enzymes highly enriched in ECs [39]. Interestingly, we found that several of these genes were transcriptionally downregulated in our mutant conditions, while others were upregulated (Appendix Fig 3F-H).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results reported in this paper provide a solid basis to addressing these questions. Despite significant differences in the niche structure, signaling cascades for regulating stem cell activity, and cellular differentiation pathways between the ISC and GSC lineages [(Amoyel et al, 2014;Doupe et al, 2018;Jiang et al, 2011;Jiang et al, 2009;Kiger et al, 2001;Leatherman and Dinardo, 2008;Li et al, 2014;Lin et al, 2008;Ohlstein and Spradling, 2007;Stine et al, 2014;Tulina and Matunis, 2001) and reviewed in (de Cuevas and Matunis, 2011;Kahney et al, 2019;Losick et al, 2011;Morrison and Spradling, 2008)], many features of asymmetric histone inheritance are common between these two stem cell systems. First, the cellular specificity in the GSC lineage has been shown by asymmetric histone inheritance in asymmetrically dividing GSCs but not in symmetrically dividing spermatogonial cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, EE-C10, a unique cluster, was distinguished by a relatively low level of pros expression and high levels of Dl and Notch expression (Figures 1D and 1E). These cells also retained the expression of ISCenriched genes, including Sox21a and Sox100b, as well as several ISC-specific E(spl)-C genes such as m3 and ma (Chen et al, 2016b;Doupé et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2019;Meng and Biteau, 2015;Zhai et al, 2015) ( Figure S2A, highlighted in blue), indicating that these cells are EE progenitor cells (EEPs), and each of them usually gives rise to a pair of EEs by dividing once before terminal differentiation (Chen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Scrna-seq Analysis Of Ees Identifies Distinct Ee Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%