1993
DOI: 10.2307/358383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

I-Dropping and Androgyny: The Authorial I in Scholarly Writing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the initial shifts in research writing is the more relaxed use of the first person pronoun. But this perfunctory "I-dropping" (see Raymond, 1993) is too weak a gesture to incorporate the complex splits and shifts in the subject positions of the researcher, characterized by a mixture of divided interests and values influencing the research process. Another rhetorical move has been to open the report with an announcement of the subject positions occupied by the researcher: "I am a white male tenured liberal from the mid-west."…”
Section: Constructing Alternate Modes Of Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the initial shifts in research writing is the more relaxed use of the first person pronoun. But this perfunctory "I-dropping" (see Raymond, 1993) is too weak a gesture to incorporate the complex splits and shifts in the subject positions of the researcher, characterized by a mixture of divided interests and values influencing the research process. Another rhetorical move has been to open the report with an announcement of the subject positions occupied by the researcher: "I am a white male tenured liberal from the mid-west."…”
Section: Constructing Alternate Modes Of Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When necessary, my own views and actions are occasionally written in firstperson, to avoid confusing them with the description of the material and the actions of those who appear in the narrative (for a discussion of the use of first person, see e.g. Kirsch, 1994;Raymond, 1993). In addition, in the analysis of the material that appears in the narrative, each document has been considered as an important object in its own right.…”
Section: Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%