2009
DOI: 10.1177/036168430903300307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“I Don't Know Who to Blame”: Hiv-Positive South African Women Navigating Heterosexual Infection

Abstract: Women who become HIV infected through heterosexual transmission are faced with the task of making sense of how they became infected. This paper presents a qualitative analysis based on interviews with 35 HIV-positive South African Black women. A specific theme, that blame of a male partner was avoided or disavowed in interviews, is explored in relation to broader contexts concerning gender and HIV. It is suggested that the repeated phrase “I don't know who to blame” expresses gender-differentiated speaking rig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This quandary was resolved sooner for women with children, typically within the weeks after diagnosis. Studies in different contexts have documented that the main worry after an antenatal diagnosis was the deterrence of vertical transmission (Fletcher et al, 2016;Kelly et al, 2009;Kelly et al, 2012;Long 2009;McDonald, 2008;Willcocks et al, 2016). This study found that despite medical reassurance, the possibility of vertical transmission was a concern for both newly diagnosed mothers and pregnant women irrespective of the risk, suggesting that there was an exaggerated sense of the threat of potential infection in their children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This quandary was resolved sooner for women with children, typically within the weeks after diagnosis. Studies in different contexts have documented that the main worry after an antenatal diagnosis was the deterrence of vertical transmission (Fletcher et al, 2016;Kelly et al, 2009;Kelly et al, 2012;Long 2009;McDonald, 2008;Willcocks et al, 2016). This study found that despite medical reassurance, the possibility of vertical transmission was a concern for both newly diagnosed mothers and pregnant women irrespective of the risk, suggesting that there was an exaggerated sense of the threat of potential infection in their children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Accordingly, women are often unable to insist on continuous condom-use in their long-term relationships as this may be construed as a sign of unfaithfulness or disobedience on their part, which could instigate abuse [66]. This is often compounded by gender inequalities in relationships, which compromise a woman's agency in negotiating the use of condoms in particular circumstances [5,66,67]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both female participants quoted above evidenced hurt and pain associated with betrayal and both did so with a sense of powerlessness and desperation that relegated them to the victim/spectator position [20]. This sense of helplessness associated with the victim role is as much a mirror to the gendered power differentials at play in men and women's negotiation of disclosure and betrayal, as it is a reflection of the co-option of women in reinforcing gendered constructions of victimology [5], which are predictive of negative relational and health outcomes for both partners [29,30].…”
Section: Living With Hiv: Vulnerability and Invincibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous approaches have suggested that social representations of HIV-infected women present them as threatening and "bad", even when associated with the positive construct of motherhood (Long, 2009b). Representations of HIV-positive motherhood further extend to the social stereotype of the deviant or "bad" mother, a societal scapegoat who is identified as one who is unable to or fails to protect her child from harm, juxtaposed against the "good" mother who is revered as nurturing and self-sacrificing (Ladd-Taylor & Umansky, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%