2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.121.160501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dephrasure Channel and Superadditivity of Coherent Information

Abstract: The quantum capacity of a quantum channel captures its capability for noiseless quantum communication. It lies at the heart of quantum information theory. Unfortunately, our poor understanding of nonadditivity of coherent information makes it hard to understand the quantum capacity of all but very special channels. In this paper, we consider the dephrasure channel, which is the concatenation of a dephasing channel and an erasure channel. This very simple channel displays remarkably rich and exotic properties: … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
82
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in contrast to the GADC the raw ansatz is indeed able to find superadditive quantum codes. For = k 2, these codes found using the raw ansatz are optimal (as already observed in [LLS18a]), while for = k 3, 4 they are clearly outperformed by our neural network codes. Another observation of [LLS18a] is that the dephasing part of  p q , suggests a Schmidt ansatz for quantum codes, a neural network state version of which is discussed in equation (16) in section 5.…”
Section: Dephrasure Channelsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, in contrast to the GADC the raw ansatz is indeed able to find superadditive quantum codes. For = k 2, these codes found using the raw ansatz are optimal (as already observed in [LLS18a]), while for = k 3, 4 they are clearly outperformed by our neural network codes. Another observation of [LLS18a] is that the dephasing part of  p q , suggests a Schmidt ansatz for quantum codes, a neural network state version of which is discussed in equation (16) in section 5.…”
Section: Dephrasure Channelsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…For = k 2, these codes found using the raw ansatz are optimal (as already observed in [LLS18a]), while for = k 3, 4 they are clearly outperformed by our neural network codes. Another observation of [LLS18a] is that the dephasing part of  p q , suggests a Schmidt ansatz for quantum codes, a neural network state version of which is discussed in equation (16) in section 5. However, in the high-noise regime investigated above, this Schmidt ansatz did not yield codes performing as well as the codes n k resp.n k *.…”
Section: Dephrasure Channelsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations