Idiosyncratic Deals at Work 2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88516-8_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

I-deals as a Human Resource Initiative: Exciting Innovation or Passing Fad?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The earliest study on IHRPs was done by Schuster (1986), who reported that the greater the number of innovative practices, the more people-oriented the management philosophy and more effective the organisation. Other studies have also reported a relationship between progressive/sophisticated HR practices and various measures of firm performance (Hiltrop, 1996(Hiltrop, , 1999Stroh and Caliguiri, 1998;Varma et al, 1999). According to Hiltrop (1996), these results do not prove that innovative or progressive HR practices cause better financial performance but only that the two may be related.…”
Section: Relationship With Hrm and Performancementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The earliest study on IHRPs was done by Schuster (1986), who reported that the greater the number of innovative practices, the more people-oriented the management philosophy and more effective the organisation. Other studies have also reported a relationship between progressive/sophisticated HR practices and various measures of firm performance (Hiltrop, 1996(Hiltrop, , 1999Stroh and Caliguiri, 1998;Varma et al, 1999). According to Hiltrop (1996), these results do not prove that innovative or progressive HR practices cause better financial performance but only that the two may be related.…”
Section: Relationship With Hrm and Performancementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Perceived support can also be observed as supervisors communicate and display respect and recognition to employees (Eisenberger et al, 2002) or provide emotional support in terms of understanding the unique needs of their subordinates (Kelly et al, 2020). Thus, high supervisor support signals to employees that they can not only to initiate a negotiation but also to obtain a positive result (Varma et al, 2022). Moreover, high perceived supervisor support also signals that supervisors are concerned with employees' needs and well-being and ultimately entails a social exchange relationship which implies that both parties are key in helping the other achieve their goals (Cropanzano & Mitchell, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervisor Support and I-deals Supervisors are important organizational agents who not only represent the organization (Shore et al, 2004), but who are also key in acknowledging and addressing employees' needs at work (M. Bal & Rousseau, 2015;Varma et al, 2022). Particularly in the case of I-deals, employees are likely to negotiate any personalized benefits with their immediate supervisors (Rousseau, 2005;Simosi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that employees who are involved in the design and implementation of HPWS are more likely to support and maintain these systems over time (Varma et al;1999). Additionally, employee empowerment, which refers to the degree to which employees have autonomy and control over their work, has been found to be positively associated with the longterm sustainability of HPWS (Para-González et al 2019).…”
Section: Individual Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%