2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8cp06819d
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

De novo prediction of cross-effect efficiency for magic angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization

Abstract: From the polarizing agent geometry and EPR properties to the prediction of magic angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization efficiency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the MAS CE mechanism described in subsection 2.1 is only efficient when the multiple energy level crossings and anti-crossings occur within a time shorter than T1(Si) [74]. As an example for nitroxide biradicals, such as AMUPol, T1(Si) times are about 0.5 ms [83] and as a result, the efficiency of the DNP transfer increases up to a MAS frequency of ca. 2 kHz (see Figure 12a).…”
Section: Mas Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the MAS CE mechanism described in subsection 2.1 is only efficient when the multiple energy level crossings and anti-crossings occur within a time shorter than T1(Si) [74]. As an example for nitroxide biradicals, such as AMUPol, T1(Si) times are about 0.5 ms [83] and as a result, the efficiency of the DNP transfer increases up to a MAS frequency of ca. 2 kHz (see Figure 12a).…”
Section: Mas Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 The downward eld dependence of the whole DNP process is also well reproduced by numerical simulations. [21][22][23][24] Several approaches have recently been developed to overcome this unfavorable eld dependence. One solution to achieve high enhancements at very high magnetic elds is to exploit the favorable eld dependence of Overhauser Effect (OE) DNP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c,d) Steady-state nuclear polarization, P ∞ , relative to electronic equilibrium polarization as a function of distance (c) and electronic relaxation time (d) obtained from simulations (dots) and from the analytical expressions given in eqs 7 and 8 (lines). All calculations were done for a single electron spin S = 1/2 coupled to a single I = 1/2 nucleus with the gyromagnetic ratio of 17 O in a 9.4 T magnetic field at 100 K under 0.35 MHz microwave irradiation 40 on-resonance with the double-quantum transitions and assuming T 2e = T 1e .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%