2014
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

dDocent: a RADseq, variant-calling pipeline designed for population genomics of non-model organisms

Abstract: Restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) has become a powerful and useful approach for population genomics. Currently, no software exists that utilizes both paired-end reads from RADseq data to efficiently produce population-informative variant calls, especially for non-model organisms with large effective population sizes and high levels of genetic polymorphism. dDocent is an analysis pipeline with a user-friendly, command-line interface designed to process individually barcoded RADseq data (with d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
214
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 392 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
214
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; details may be found in Supplementary Methods. Assembly, mapping, and SNP genotyping employed the dDocent pipeline17. The initial dataset consisted of 339,032 variant SNP loci across 38,122 fragments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; details may be found in Supplementary Methods. Assembly, mapping, and SNP genotyping employed the dDocent pipeline17. The initial dataset consisted of 339,032 variant SNP loci across 38,122 fragments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second set of methods for reduced representation uses restriction enzymes to isolate small pieces of DNA (such as restriction-associated digest sequencing [RAD-seq] or genotyping by sequencing [GBS; reviewed in Puritz et al 2014b; Andrews et al 2016]; table A2). These methods are useful for building genetic linkage maps and establishing neutral patterns of population structure (Andolfatto et al 2011; El-shire et al 2011).…”
Section: The Missing Genome: Current Genotyping and Sequencing Approamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This choice will determine the appropriate type of assembly program to use (e.g., GATK: McKenna et al., 2010; dePristo et al., 2011; Van der Auwera et al., 2013 with a reference genome; Stacks: Catchen, Amores, Hohenlohe, Cresko, & Postlethwait, 2011; Catchen, Hohenlohe, Bassham, Amores, & Cresko, 2013; Paris, Stevens, & Catchen, 2017; or dDocent: Puritz, Hollenbeck, & Gold, 2014 for a de novo assembly). Using a high‐quality and well‐annotated reference genome facilitates the identification of candidate genes and gene regions and allows for a truly genomic approach (e.g., considering physical linkage between regions with adaptive variation; Manel et al., 2016).…”
Section: Design and Implement: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%