2007
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-0859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CXCL12 G801A Polymorphism Is a Risk Factor for Sporadic Prostate Cancer Susceptibility

Abstract: Purpose: The chemokine CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 have been found to be associated with cancer metastasis. A single nucleotide polymorphism of CXCL12 G801A has been described and is regarded as a target for cis-acting factor that has the ability to up-regulate CXCL12 expression. Currently, there are no reports investigating the role of CXCL12 G801A polymorphism in prostate cancer (PC). Experimental Design: We genotyped CXCL12 G801A and p53Arg72Pro in 167 PC patients and 167 age-matched healthy subjects. Gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
59
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(37 reference statements)
4
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These include CC chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5, MIM#187011) À403 promoter variant (rs2107538G>A), CXC chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12, MIM#600835) +180 3 ¶ untranslated regulatory variant (rs1801157G>A), CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2, MIM#601267) nonsynonymous variant CCR2V64I (rs1799864G>A), chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5, MIM#601373) 32 bp deletion variant CCR5D32, and CX3C chemokine receptor (CX3CR1, MIM#601470) nonsynonymous variants CX3CR1V249I (rs3732379G>A) and CX3CR1T280M (rs3732378C>T). The CXCL12 +801G>A polymorphism was recently shown to be a risk factor for prostate cancer in a Japanese study (13). The remaining variants, although associated with many infectious diseases and cancers, have not yet been investigated in prostate cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include CC chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5, MIM#187011) À403 promoter variant (rs2107538G>A), CXC chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12, MIM#600835) +180 3 ¶ untranslated regulatory variant (rs1801157G>A), CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2, MIM#601267) nonsynonymous variant CCR2V64I (rs1799864G>A), chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5, MIM#601373) 32 bp deletion variant CCR5D32, and CX3C chemokine receptor (CX3CR1, MIM#601470) nonsynonymous variants CX3CR1V249I (rs3732379G>A) and CX3CR1T280M (rs3732378C>T). The CXCL12 +801G>A polymorphism was recently shown to be a risk factor for prostate cancer in a Japanese study (13). The remaining variants, although associated with many infectious diseases and cancers, have not yet been investigated in prostate cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most compelling evidence for the role of the SdF-1 G→a polymorphism in malignancy is provided by previous genotype and allele-frequency studies showing that this specific polymorphism is associated with a susceptibility to breast, lung and prostate cancer (36,38,(40)(41)(42). in the current study, we attempted to determine whether an association exists between this SdF-1 gene variant and pancreatic cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…on the other hand, current studies on colorectal cancer have failed to suggest a serious impact of the SdF-1 polymorphism on the risk of colorectal cancer development (43,44). Hypothetically, different mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of colorectal carcinogenesis, along with a host of modifying molecular events, may account for this lack of association, in contrast to the documented role of the SdF-1 polymorphism in breast, lung, prostate and pancreatic cancer (36,38,(40)(41)(42). in other words, based on tissue origin, the influence of the sDF-1 gene polymorphism may contribute differentially between malignancies in mediating tumor progression, angiogenesis, metastasis and leukocyte migration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, using the same search strategy and end-of-search date as those of Li et al (2011), we have located four relevant studies in Pubmed database with a total of 544 prostate cancer patients and 1005 controls (Wu et al, 1995;Hirata et al, 2007Hirata et al, , 2009Xu et al, 2010) (Table 1), which were not included in the meta-analysis even though they were consistent with the search criteria. Among them, two articles (Hirata et al, 2007(Hirata et al, , 2009 had duplicate data of cases and controls, so we selected the most complete and larger study (Hirata et al, 2007). Finally, three newly additional studies should be included.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%